Saturday, December 24, 2016

Issue 2



THE BRETON/GEROL NEWSLETTER


To BGN readers: The second issue of the Breton-Gerol Newsletter comes to you in the very last days of the outgoing year. The 2017 issues will have an improved design and appearance. Our main objective remains the same: to update our readers on the events and developments on the international scene with particular emphasis on such regions as Russia and Eurasian Economic Union and Central Asia.

We wish you Happy New Year !

--o--

RUSSIA: IN ANTICIPATION OF TRUMP’S WORLD



Never in post WW-2 history was Moscow so obsessed by the ascendance of a new American president.


At the countless political talk shows on Russian TV the name of Donald Trump is mentioned just as frequently as that of Vladimir Putin. The recent quote from the popular Moscow political commentator Andrei Norkin says it all: “One thing is clear-Trump is a real friend of Russia”.

In the Kremlin however not everyone is so certain. The closer we get to the 20th of January 2017 when the word “elect” will be dropped and the Trump’s presidency will begin, the more wary the policy makers in Moscow feel. The prevalent view within the political-military establishment in Russia now is that it would not be so easy for Trump to overcome the traditional anti-Russian monolithic triad: Congress, State Department, and Pentagon. The course of foreign policy in Washington will not occur overnight even if Trump’s new administration wants to change it. That is why the Kremlin continues – with the impressive speed – to cement its international achievements of 2016: Saving Assad regime in Syria, signing cooperation agreements with Turkey and Iran, overcoming Western economic sanctions and keeping the situation in Eastern Ukraine in limbo.


So when Donald Trump becomes president he will clearly see the consolidated positions of Moscow. At that stage the new start of West-East dialogue could commence.

At this pending junction Canada has an opportunity to start its own dialogue with Russia in order not to be left behind by other significant economic players as Japan, EU, South Korea and Brazil in calibrating its relations with Russia and Eurasian Economic Union to fit this new reality.


--o--

THE AFFAIRS OF STATE


Rex Tillerson with President Putin and Igor Sechin, President of Rosneft, June 15, 2012, Tuapse (Krasnodar Region), Source: President of Russia Website

The proposed appointment of Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State is eliciting an inordinate volume of comments on account of his friendship with Putin and his lack of government or diplomatic experience.

The friendship with Putin needs to be put in perspective: while successfully advancing the interests of his corporation Tillerson managed to gain the respect of his Russian counterparts, to the point where the Kremlin refers to him as “highly professional”. Tillerson’s work with Russia would confirm that it is possible for a major US entity to have a convergence of interests with the Russian government. Not a problem in itself one might think, but this no “zero-sum game” approach irks the Washington neo-conservative establishment for which such convergence is inconceivable.  Others even more object to the suggestion fact that Tillerson is a friend of Putin, or in their view a friend of the devil incarnate. The implication is that Tillerson lacks judgment in picking his buddies. If indeed Tillerson became friends of sort with Putin, it is mainly because his work took him to Moscow when the entire Western business community was courting Russia and he was successful in building contacts in Russia. Altogether, it might not be so negative to have an international business professional with close contacts in places like Moscow and Beijing – to solve potentially difficult issues.


The work that Tillerson successfully did at Exxon requires skills that are easily transferable to his proposed new job. Tillerson’s proposed appointment is consistent with President-elect Trump’s main foreign policy objective as stated during his campaign that is the advancement and promotion of US interests. Tillerson would be expected to advance US interests, as (ruthlessly, some have said) he did with Exxon’s throughout his career. The implications for US policy in relation to Russia and Ukraine tend to be more obvious and offer no comfort for Ukraine. The implications for US policy in the tangled web that is the Middle East are less clear. Beyond the relationship with Israel and continuing to protect the secure access to the region’s energy resources, what US interests will Trump and Tillerson want to promote? 

--o--

SANCTIONS, COUNTER-SANCTIONS AND

AGRICULTURE

In mid-December the EU extended for another 6 months the sanctions it has imposed on Russia in the aftermath of the annexation of Crimea and the military confrontation in Eastern Ukraine. The position of the incoming Trump administration in respect to the sanctions against Russia remains to be confirmed, but there are indications that a repeal of sanctions is more likely than not. If not right away than in a near future.

The range of Western sanctions includes diplomatic measures, asset freezes, travel bans, specific restrictions in relation to Crimea as well as some economic sanctions affecting military goods, dual-use goods, and equipment for the oil industry. They also include restrictions on certain financial instruments and on transactions with certain entities.

In response, Russia has issued its own reciprocal travel bans. More important, the Russian counter-sanctions adopted in August 2014 have targeted the agricultural imports from countries that had adopted the initial sanctions: the United States, the EU, Norway, Canada and Australia.

Russian counter-sanctions seem have had a more direct impact on trade than the initial Western sanctions. The EU sanctions were presented as a means to influence Russia’s behaviour in the right direction, not as a punitive measure. The idea was to target certain responsible individuals and entities but not to affect the general population. Russian counter-sanctions were meant to punish the initiators of sanctions. Food exporters from the targeted countries have clearly suffered the most. For example, Canadian pork industry lost close to a billion in sales to Russia. Others   have also been affected by the deteriorating business climate and, in the exclusive case of Canada, by the absence of active trade promotion.

Overall sanctions have clearly had a negative effect on the Russian economy.  According to World Bank data, foreign direct investment in 2015 was only 10% of what it was in 2013. The low price of oil on the world market also contributed to the economic slowdown. It would be difficult to assess what did more damage.

In addition to sourcing some of its imports elsewhere, Russia’s official policy response has been to promote import substitution and to claim that the counter-sanctions were having a favourable impact on the Russian agri-food sector.

A few observations emerge at this time:

The sanctions have had their impact on the Russian economy, but with the rise in the price of oil and re-alignment of financial and trade flows, that impact is wearing off. Modest growth is expected in 2017.

The impact of counter-sanctions on the Russian agri-food sector is conveniently over-estimated by the Russian side, it has become clear that the counter-sanctions planned or not, were a clever means to give a boost to the domestic agri-food industry which was already improving significantly in any event. As of this year, Russia’s value of agricultural exports now exceeds that of its military exports, a sign of the growing vitality of the agri-food sector.

The Western sanctions have not caused the desired policy change in Russia. Neither will their continuation. 

The situation in Ukraine and Crimea has not changed significantly, but with a Trump administration whose proposed Secretary of State is openly in opposition to Russia sanctions, as well as with the already strong dissenting views within the EU, the future of sanctions is far from certain. 

--o--

PERSONALITY IN FOCUS: 

LUKASHENKO’S CHOICE




President Lukachenko and President Putin, November 22, 2016, Moscow, Source: President of Belarus Website



Aleksandr Lukashenko, irreplaceable president of Belarus suddenly stopped repeating the previously popular mantra of being an unconditional ally of mother-Russia.

Now he prefers to mention “approach problems” between Moscow and Minsk on such issues as Ukraine, relations with Europe and integration within the Eurasian Economic Union.

Now when the Western sanctions against Belarus were suspended, Lukashenko indicated his desire to have closer ties with the European Union. At the same time he refuses to pay Russian set prices for its natural gas claiming that prices and way too exuberant. It is worth to note that Moscow’s irritation with the maverick Belarus leader is growing and we can expect some sort of increased frictions between the two allies.



DEATH OF AMBASSADOR






Andrey Karlov, the assassinated Russia’s ambassador in Ankara fell victim to new circle of Islamic terrorism which, according to some experts, targets diplomats and state officials worldwide.

In Ankara it was an obvious and embarrassing lapse of security on the part of Turkish and Russian special services. Aside from this obvious fact a more nuanced conclusion is to be made. The assassination of ambassadors though historically rare always had far reaching consequences. In some cases it was a pretext for war, break of diplomatic and economic relations or deep international complications. That’s why the international terrorism from time to time turns to that proven tactic.

Ambassador Karlov’s murder will not undermine relations between Russia and Turkey but at least it should force countries to greatly improve the security of diplomats across globe-after all terrorism is a global menace.


--o--

NEW MINISTER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Maxim Oreshkin, Source: Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation

The appointment of 34 year-old Maxim Oreshkin (former Deputy Minister of Finance) as a Minister of Economic Development of Russia (to replace Alexei Ulyukaev( who was fired after being charged with corruption and put under house arrest)  raises some interesting questions.  Although Oreshkin has a positive reputation as a reform-minded and independent, progressive economist, one has to wonder about whether he has the chops, experience and  skills to manage such key department of the Russian government.  While his predecessor awaits the results of his prosecution for alleged corruption, senior officials in the ministry must be wondering about their future.


This appointment by President Putin will not necessarily embolden reformers, but might in fact incite senior ministry officials to protect their sinecures and avoid making decisions.  What this entire episode reminds one is that in post-Soviet Russia, when the chairs are re-arranged around the cabinet table, prospects for implementing reforms and cutting a bloated public service slip even further away.

--o--


VISA FREE TRAVEL: KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKISTAN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH

Canadians will now be able to visa-free travel to Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan for up to 30 days (in same cases visas could be obtained at airport on arrival).  Do not expect a reciprocal measure from Canada as long as there is the risk of a large influx of unfounded asylum applications from the two countries.

EU AND UKRAINE VISA -FREE TRAVEL: READ THE FINE PRINT

The announcement of visa-free travel to the EU for Ukrainian citizens may have been perceived as visa-free travel being a fait accompli. Not exactly. Negotiations still have to be conducted between the EU Presidency and the European Parliament. The visa-free travel would also be accompanied by a new improved suspension mechanism that would allow the re-introduction of visas if, among other situations, there is a rise in unfounded asylum applications.
.

ALEPPO, UNDER INTERNATIONAL OBSERVATION

Russia’s agreeing to UN-led international observation mission in Aleppo may not have been so difficult. With the military initiative on the Syrian side and its allies and with most of the fighting done, an international presence condones the status quo and shifts of the responsibility for humanitarian assistance to a broader group. It also relieves Russia and Syria from carrying all the opprobrium for the disastrous situation in East Aleppo. The observation mission may be difficult to put together, but may be there for a long while

ALL-SYRIA PEACE TALKS IN ASTANA

The idea sounds far-fetched, but would not have been proposed if there was not something serious behind it. Negotiations held in a secular but predominantly Muslim country may not be a guarantee of success, but may be more acceptable to some of the factions.

PUTIN ON LEAVE

President Putin recently alluded to his wish to travel the world once he leaves the presidency. Coming from an individual who generally does not say things without a reason, this is intriguing. The next presidential election is less than 15 months away.


Saturday, November 19, 2016

Issue 1


THE BRETON/GEROL NEWSLETTER

The Breton/Gerol newsletter (BGN) is aimed at partially filling the vacuum of knowledge, understanding and realistic analysis of the events in Russia, Eurasian Economic Union and Eastern Europe that has developed in the last 2 decades - together with the total disappearance of the Western School of Russian and Eastern European studies. It was mistakenly assumed that with the collapse of world communism the role of political and economic entities that replaced regimes in that part of part of the world somehow became less relevant.
The chain of dangerous conflicts in Georgia (2008), Ukraine (2013) and Syria (2015 when Russia joined the hostilities) as well as the outburst of antagonism between two major nuclear powers Russia and the United States had proven that we do need to restore the level of thorough and detailed analysis that existed during the Cold War.
In this new political reality Canada can play a creative and significant role. While being a staunch and loyal member of the Western alliance, we can find our own ways to positively influence West and East alike. This approach requires an objective analysis and specific knowledge - something that Breton/Gerol Newsletter is aimed to offer.

Gilles Breton
Ilya Gerol

End of Political Mythology

For a long time it had become a habitual game; first you create a stereotype, then you start to believe in it and finally it defines your views, behavior and decision-making.
That's exactly what happened during the election marathon in the United States with all reverberations here in Canada and all around the world.
It appeared crystal clear that Hillary Clinton and only her was destined to become the 45th president. After all it was a ripe time for woman to become a leader of the free world. It was also the time to really empower every possible minority group - ethnic, racial, gender and whatever else was on the liberal agenda - around that personality.
Obviously this new "majority" had to win, hadn't it?
The reality proved however that there was no such mythical majority. It had also appeared that African-American and Latino communities did not wish to be taken for granted or even more importantly to conform to the established left-wing stereotypes. As a result two thirds of Latino and one third of African-Americans voted for Trump. The same can be said about women.
Stereotypes aside, we have to admit that majority as well as minority of the electorate have the same priorities; healthy economy, lower taxes, and balanced approach to immigration. And this is exactly what Trump offered to them - admittedly not always in a politically correct form.
At the same time his foreign policy outlook sounded more reasonable and moderate that one of his opponent; he rejected ever growing antagonism against Russia as a cornerstone of foreign policy, dogmatic support for a conveyor-belt of revolutions everywhere without consideration for consequences as it was in Egypt, Libya and to a certain extent Syria.
In the new, multilayered political reality that is unfolding as we speak, Canada can be very instrumental in harmonizing uneasy relations that will arise between U.S. and European Union and of course between the West and Russia.

IG

Trump and Putin: shall we dance now?

Of all the statements that President-elect Trump made during the electoral campaign, it turns out that the few ones that were close to the mark were his observations on the failure of the Obama foreign policy in the Middle East and the inadequate management of the relationship with Russia, in the latter case letting President Putin be the more decisive leader.  Being right on the mistakes of your predecessor does not however constitute policy-making and it remains to be seen what the President-elect will offer as real alternatives.


In the context of the Middle East, one of the often-repeated statements of Mr. Trump is that he would deal with ISIL and other forms of terrorist in a much more decisive manner. Inasmuch as ISIL largely operates in Syria, where Russia has essentially had the initiative since it undertook military operations there a little more than a year ago, Mr. Trump’s plan would have to take into account the Russian factor.  Would he emulate the Russian practice of aggressive bombing of perceived terrorist targets? Would there be greater willingness to “co-ordinate” military activity with Russia? Yet, Russia may not be Trump’s greatest problem. Dealing with Turkish President Erdogan, bringing Qatar and Saudi Arabia in line, as well as looking after Israel’s interests will be equally challenging.


Mr. Trump’s comments about the strong leadership of President Putin served to illustrate the relative weakness of Putin’s US counterpart. Some have argued that there was more to the comment and that Trump found something of himself in the decisive and authoritarian Mr. Putin. In fact Putin and Trump often express their policy leitmotiv as the pursuit of their respective country’s national interests. In the case of Mr. Trump, this is bound to cause some discomfort among the millionaires currently running the government in Ukraine, who will have to convince the President-elect that supporting them is in the US national interest.


Mr. Trump’s position will differ from that of his predecessor is that he can claim that he was not the one who was outmanoeuvered by Putin when it comes to Syria or sat idly by when Russia reclaimed Crimea and set up a state within the state in Eastern Ukraine. Even more significant is that by having good words for Putin Trump has set himself in complete opposition to the Washington and NATO establishments for whom virtually nothing good can come out of the Kremlin.


For Canada, this means that there may be even greater pressure from the supporters of Ukraine on the Canadian government not to imitate a possible US disengagement in Ukraine. Symbolic measures may be continued and the same speeches repeated, but Canadian and even EU support will not protect the Ukraine from a having to face a major re-assessment of its own position. Furthermore, if President-elect Trump follows up on his idea of forging a new relationship with President Putin, it will increase the pressure on the Canadian government to activate the normalisation of its own relationship with Russia.



On the Russian side, the reaction to the election of an unusual politician has been suitably reserved. In the days of the Soviet Union criticism that was privately levelled toward legendary Soviet Foreign Minister Gromyko was that his policy in relation to the US was to await the return of a Russia friendly president such as Roosevelt (FDR not Teddy). Gromyko might have smiled on the morning of November 9th.

GB

President-elect is not President yet...

Experts on free trade issues in the U.S. were somewhat taken aback by the excessively rapid reaction of Canadian PM Justin Trudeau and his ministers to the Donald Trump's pre-election statements on his determination to dismantle NAFTA. The reaction had been even more surprising in light of the fact that the president-elect had evidently softened many of his previous claims.
BGN sources in Washington are certain that there will be no dismantling of NAFTA but rather some business-like negotiations of some outdated elements of the agreement. One has to keep in mind that in future interactions with such a shrewd negotiator and deal-maker as Donald Trump, it would be beneficial to keep your cards close to the chest.

Barely afloat...

Russian parliament Duma has approved the first reading of its 3-year budget. On the positive side - the only positive side of that monumental document - is that Russian economy will not sink further. Although the growth will be minimal, not more that 1.5%, it marks a certain improvement after 3 years of free fall. The budget is based on the projected oil prices of 40$ per barrel. This brings the necessity of total austerity and cuts on everything except for military spending.
It would be however reasonably to assume that Kremlin's transparency about its economic hardships could signal its readiness for a major negotiated compromise with the West concerning Syria and Ukraine. All depends whether Russian expectations of President Trump's willingness to change the course as he claimed during his election campaign will materialize. Trump's recent conversation with Vladimir Putin and appointment of allegedly more sympathetic to Russia Mike Flynn as National Security adviser points to this direction.

Who will care about Ukraine?

Former US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul’s Twitter message on election night: Biggest loser in the world tonight-- Ukraine. Your only hope is to get really serious about reform and keep Euros supportive.

Kindred spirits

Dmitry Peskov, President Putin’s Press Secretary, on CNN, November 11
"If our two leaders, I mean the current Russia's leader, President Putin, and President-elect Trump are wise enough to have a political will to talk to each other ... then we'll really have a chance to talk and to try to solve the problems being constructive," Peskov said. "Because what we have currently is a very lousy relationship."
"They seem to be very pragmatic, both of them," Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Christiane Amanpour. "We've heard Mr. Trump mentioning overwhelming priority of America's national interests. And the same is being proclaimed by President Putin. He's very consistent in that, saying that Russia and Russia's people's prosperity and their national interests are the main objective and main priority."
He continued: "But at the same time they both expressed a readiness to develop good relations with other countries in the world ... this is a very good, very positive coincidence in my opinion."

One, two, three?

Rumen Radev will become Bulgaria’s next president  Radev, the former commander of Bulgaria’s Air Force, is a relative newcomer to politics and is supported by the opposition socialist party. His election is seen as a boost for Russia and a letdown to western allies, as he is considered to be Russia-friendly
Igor Dodon is to become the next president of Moldova with a 55% victory of the popular vote. A loss of trust in pro-European leaders appears to have helped Dodon who wants to restore close ties with Russia.

The election of two “Russia-friendly” presidents may have limited political consequences in itself. It is, however, revealing of the fact that being perceived as pro-Russian is not an obstacle to an electoral victory. 


The authors


Ilya Gerol, former foreign editor of the Citizen in Ottawa, syndicated columnist in Canadian, US and European media specializing in international affairs. His particular area of expertise includes Russia, Eurasian Economic Union, Eastern and Central Europe.  Ilya Gerol has written several books, one of them, The Manipulators, had become a textbook on relations of media and society.


During his career in the Canadian Foreign Service, Gilles Breton had three assignments at the Canadian Embassy  in Moscow. His first posting there began during the Soviet period, in 1983. His last was from 2008 to 2012 as Minister-Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission. He also served as Deputy Director responsible for Canada’s relations with Russia from 2000 to 2008. As an international civil servant, he was Deputy Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights in Warsaw from 1994 to 1997.