Thursday, August 30, 2018

Issue 22

THE BRETON/GEROLNEWSLETTER



INTER-ESTABLISHMENT CONFRONTATION IN WASHINGTON AND ITS WORLD-WIDE IMPACT


Even before the current crisis,-some are calling it more serious than the Watergate affair, few were truly neutral about President Trump. His inadequate reaction to global and local events, questionable morality, controversial decisions taken only to be reversed the next morning, shocking and often vulgar tweets and statements, his ambiguous relationship with the facts and his innate conviction that big politics is akin to running a business always made Trump the most unusual and odd president of the United States in recent memory. In two years on the job Trump managed simultaneously to ruin US relations with Europe, China, NATO, Canada, Mexico and further destroy already poor relations with Russia. Furthermore Trump is constantly in conflict with members of his own administration and the American intelligence community. And here comes the main paradox of the realities in Washington: Trump's approval rating is slightly over 40%, surprisingly high for the level of scandals around him. The other side of this paradox is the curious duality of the administration: while Trump deals with all the shenanigans and controversies, his administration carries on with day to day business in almost a professional way.

More clarity can, however, be expected after the November 6th midterm elections. If the Republicans lose control of the House of Representatives or the Senate (or both) the fate of the 45th President could change dramatically.

--o--

CANADA'S FUTILE AUGUST ATTEMPTS TO RESURRECT NAFTA



Those who predicted that Trump's unpredictability had limits were obviously wrong. His sudden announcement that the US and Mexico had reached the "biggest ever" deal, replacing NAFTA, was an exaggeration. It simultaneously insulted Canada. Apparently Canada was not even consulted during the lengthy bilateral negotiations between US and Mexico. Canadian politicians and experts interpreted this demonstrative snub to Canada as Trump's wish to prove that NAFTA no longer exists. Ottawa was given an ultimatum of sorts: to join the US-Mexico deal as it is or be slapped with high tariffs on Canadian automotive production.

Chrystia Freeland postponed her umpteenth visit to Ukraine and flew to Washington in an attempt to resolve this stand-off. Canada is, so far, on the losing end in this crusade against NAFTA initiated by Donald Trump.

Canada is also facing the real threat of losing a share of American markets due to high tariffs on Canadian industrial and agricultural products. Canadian foreign policy needs a combination of flexibility and firmness that the Trudeau government is evidently lacking.


 --o--

PUTIN'S VISIT TO AUSTRIA (PLEASURE AND BUSINESS) AND GERMANY (STRICTLY BUSINESS)     

Putin's August 18th visit to Austria lasted only one hour. He came to attend the wedding of Austrian Foreign Minister Kneissl. Putin was accompanied by a renowned Cossack folk song choir. The Russian president spoke fluent German in his congratulatory address to the newlyweds and even danced with the bride.

President Putin congratulating Foreign Minister Kneissl

...with Chancellor Kurz looking on


It is highly unlikely that President Putin would do anything of such lighthearted nature without some deeper reasons. Among remarkable guests at the wedding was Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz. His country will chair the European Union for the next half a year, a very important span of time for Russia to energize those in EU that are opposed to sanctions against Russia. Another significant conversation that Putin managed to have at the wedding was with Mohammed Barkindo, Secretary General of OPEC (its center of operations is in Vienna). Ups and downs of oil prices have a direct impact on the oil-dependent Russian economy. Therefore anything to do with the business of OPEC, especially its decisions to increase or decrease the oil output is of paramount concern to Putin. Another aspect, not covered by the media at all, was that if Nord Stream 2 is implemented, Austria will become a central distributing hub for the Russia gas flow into Western Europe.

Right from the wedding Putin flew to Germany to meet Angela Merkel at her private residence near Berlin. Both leaders briefly discussed Ukraine and Syria, but the main point was the same important project of Nord Stream-2. Putin concurred with Merkel that Ukraine will remain a transit point for the Russian gas parallel to Nord Stream-2 project. Also, both sides inched closer to the idea of introducing UN peacekeepers in the Donbass region, while confirming Moscow and Berlin's adherence to Minsk II agreement.


Chancellor Merkel and President Putin meeting at Schloss Meseberg, August 18th

What adds to the complexities of every decision made in Berlin and other major EU countries in relations to economic or peace deals with Russia is the ever present reality of American pressure and Donald Trump's often unpredictable moves.

--o--

FOR UKRAINE OR FOR POROSHENKO


Since the signing of the Minsk II Agreement in 2015, there has been virtually no progress on resolving the crisis in Ukraine. Other issues do arise but Ukraine remains the most important source of conflict between the US and Russia and between the EU and Russia. The Presidential election scheduled for March 2019 and President Poroshenko now regularly polls under the 10% threshold. Even worse he is no longer in second position: some polls have him in fifth position.

As President, Poroshenko can still enjoy the support of Ukraine’s steadfast allies. There is, however, a distinct lack of enthusiasm in going the extra mile to bolster his status. The fact that he could only secure the attendance of National Security Adviser John Bolton, rather than the more senior US official he was expecting, for this year’s Independence Day celebrations in late August confirms this. As a candidate for a second term, with slowly but surely decreasing prospects, he may be tempted to use the time remaining in his presidency to promote policies and positions that might give him back the hope of a longer political life. The trouble, so to speak, is that the policies in question are merely a rearranging of the chairs on the deck of his own sinking ship.

President Poroshenko greeting John Bolton, August 24th, Kyiv

For instance, Whereas Poroshenko initially couched his initiative to seek the creation of one autocephalous Ukrainian church as a spiritual endeavour, he has now taken off the gloves and called it what it really is, a jab at he Russian Orthodox Church and at its Patriarch as close ally of Vladimir Putin.

A few months ago, Poroshenko was not so certain about the overall cancellation of the Ukraine-Russia Friendship Agreement. He now has issued instructions for measures to be taken to abrogate the Agreement. In the same vein Poroshenko had his UN Ambassador state that Ukraine was preparing a few nasty surprises for Russia at this year’s UN General Assembly.
Poroshenko’s attempts to regain the support of the nationalist electorate are not likely to change his political fortunes. These measures may indeed annoy Russian officialdom. Whether they serve to advance long-term Ukrainian interests is a moot point.

--o--

CASPIAN SEA: FIVE COUNTRIES SIGN DEAL TO END DISPUTE


Russia, Iran, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, the countries bordering the Caspian Sea, have agreed in principle on how to divide it up. The leaders of the five countries signed the Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea in Aktau, Kazakhstan. It establishes a formula for dividing up its resources and prevents other powers from setting up a military presence there.
It is an important step in the easing of regional tensions. It would be reasonable to assume that the Caspian Sea is, well, a sea. But at the heart of this long-running dispute is whether or not the 370,000 km2 body of landlocked water should be considered as a lake. Until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, that is how it was known. It was shared between the USSR and Iran. The current agreement settles this dispute to a large extent. The agreement gives the body of water a "special legal status" which means it is not defined as a sea or a lake, officials involved in the deal claimed.

Leaders of Caspian Sea countries, August 12th, Aktau

The surface water will be in common usage, meaning freedom of access for all participatory states. The seabed, which is rich in natural resources (oil and gas) and the fishing areas (including the sturgeon habitat, a source of invaluable black caviar) will be divided up.
The loser of the deal is probably Iran that will have lesser access compared to other participants. Already some Iranian news agencies have criticized the agreement.

--o--

SYRIA, ONE REGION AFTER THE OTHER


The forces of President Assad and their various allies seem to have regained full control of the southeastern part of the country. The problem of how this would be seen in Israel and in Jordan may, however, not have been entirely resolved. The presence of Russian military forces, among other areas, in the Golan Heights and the assurances offered by President Putin to PM Netanyahu and to King Abdallah may have quieted matters for the time being, but the presence of Iranian forces in relative proximity to Israel is matter over which Israel will want a long-term solution that includes the departure of Iranian units.



Assad forces are now moving North in the direction of Idlib for the next major offensive aimed at regaining territory occupied by rebel forces. The Idlib region is where the rebel forces expelled from other regions have concentrated. It is also close to the area occupied by the Turkish army and the area occupied by US-supported Kurdish forces. Dealing with the rebels is only the beginning. For Assad and his Russian allies, the other task is to assuage the concerns of Turkish President Erdogan and eventually to have him bring his troops back home. The related problem is the proximity of Kurdish forces that are the pretext for Turkey’s military presence. The latest rumour is that the US may be offering a deal that would see it leave most areas of Syria, including the Kurdish region, in exchange for the departure of Iranian forces from the vicinity of Israel. There would also be some other elements to the proposed deal including, for good measure, access to Syrian oil resources for US companies. The Syrian side has reportedly refused the deal. The Idlib battle could be a long and complicated affair.

In late August, while in Israel, National Security Adviser reiterated the warning that there would be serious consequences to any other use of chemical weapons by the Syrian Army. Shortly after, in the context of the upcoming Idlib offensive, the Russian Ministry of Defence warned of possible chemical attack provocations on the part of rebels. The UK representative at the UN called this non-sense. By starting the public relations battle even before the incident takes place, the Russian side is securing a modest tactical advantage.

Finally, some Arab observers have noted that, should the upcoming Syrian Army’s Idlib offensive be successful at weakening further the position of the Islamic State, this could have as a side effect to hasten the passage of the Islamic State from an entity defending territory to one committing random acts of terrorism in various locations, a sobering prospect.

--o--

 
MAN OF THE MONTH: ALEXEI KUDRIN



Current Auditor General and former long-time minister of finance of the Russian Federation, Alexei Kudrin has always positioned himself between constantly feuding sectors of conservatives and liberals within the Russian corridors of power. Kudrin also happened to work at St.Petersburg City Hall at the same time as Vladimir Putin. Both were Deputy Mayors under then Mayor Anatoly Sobchak, Putin’s acknowledged mentor.
As a highly qualified and respected economist, Kudrin always skillfully resisted rapid increases in the Russian military budget. That opposition eventually pitted him against powerful heads of the Russian military industrial complex and upper echelons in the Ministry of Defense. He was a champion of raising retirement age to 62 for women and 65 for men aligning Russia's pension policies to that of other European states. The then Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, in order to secure shallow populist appeal among voters, publicly denounced and fired Kudrin from the government.
Vladimir Putin, when he took over from Medvedev as President, in recognition of Kudrin's abilities made him one of his economic advisers and recently appointed him Auditor General, a position where he does not come under the supervision of his rival Dmitry Medvedev, but in which he can play a significant role in the management of government affairs. Currently Alexei Kudrin is in charge of the main scourge of Russian life,-deep and institutionalized corruption.  Kudrin
Some observers believe that Alexei Kudrin still has a political future when Putin will finally let Medvedev go.
--o--

JOHN McCAIN (1936-2018)



Now that he has passed away after a long illness, it would be Inappropriate and disrespectful to go after John McCain policy record. Historians will have plenty of time to do this later.

The fact is that he developed a reputation of great integrity and that he was a significant figure in US foreign policy for virtually the whole time of his tenure as a member of the US Senate. It is not to disparage John McCain to observe that there might not have been the same outpouring of sympathy and admiration for him had any other person than Donald Trump been the US President. McCain’s honesty and human qualities so contrast with what we see everyday of the street-smart President that his departure is felt even more deeply.

No doubt on the basis of his own personal experience in Vietnam, McCain was to the end of his life, a believer in the role of America as the liberator of oppressed people. This put him in diametrical opposition to Vladimir Putin. McCain was in the room when Vladimir Putin delivered his famous 2007 Munich speech in which it went after the very US foreign policy for which McCain was one of the most fervent apologists. The relationship between them was never going to be friendship. McCain instead befriended those he saw as standing up to Russia, especially former Georgian President Saakashvili and current Ukrainian President Poroshenko. His views of Russia were probably summarized in one of his most famous quotes: "It is a gas station run by a mafia that is masquerading as a country ».

Official Russian coverage of McCain death was initially matter-of-fact. Itar Tass for instance simply finished its relevant news item by this line: “McCain was one of the staunchest supporters of anti-Russian sanctions and was known for his harsh criticism of Moscow”. A few legislators even had some kind words about McCain’s character. Others were not so kind and went as far as to call him a war criminal. One news channel even recalled that it was a Russian missile that downed McCain aircraft over North Vietnam, living the reader to draw his own conclusions about the true reasons for McCain’s disdain for Putin’s Russia.

The comment has been made that even after McCain there would be to advocate similar policies. For now, there is certainly no one of his stature.

--o--

BRIEFLY NOTED


RUSSIA


In an unusually lengthy and somewhat dramatic address to the nation, President Putin acknowledged that the planned pension reform was too drastic and painful. In its original form the pension reform proposal, that had been suddenly introduced on the opening day of the recent World Cup in Russia, foresaw that the retirement age for women would be raised from 55 to 63 and for men from 60 to 65. This announcement triggered an unprecedented wave of social protests. Apart from economic hardships, those changes touched a nerve with most Russians because the pension system introduced in 1932 remained a sort of sacred cow in a country with low life expectancy. Taking into account popular discontent, Putin offered a compromise by which the retirement age for women will go up to 60 instead of 63. For men it will however still move up to 65.
Putin's main motivation behind this move was his desire to curb the fall of his approval rating that which has been steadily coming down and now hovers just above 60%.

UKRAINE


Kiev and self-proclaimed breakaway republics in Donbass have announced back-to-school ceasefire. While the hostilities somewhat subsided the conflict continues. President Macron's unexpected statement on the Ukrainian crisis, that was not well received in Ukraine, suggested that the US-backed idea of bringing international peacekeepers to Donbass should be scrapped for the time being. According to Macron, it would be better to concentrate on the realization of Minsk agreements in closer cooperation with Russia.

US-RUSSIA


Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev and US National Security Adviser John Bolton met in Geneva on August 23rd  for a prolonged, substantial and, according to Russian sources, constructive discussion. According to Bolton, the discussions covered “the whole range of issues that the two countries have on non-proliferation, on arms control, on a range of bilateral issues, counterterrorism, illegal immigration, cyber-related issues, regional issues, like Syria, the broader Middle East, Afghanistan, and Ukraine”. There was no joint statement at the end of the meeting on account of the disagreement over whether or not Russia meddled in US elections.

CHINA


In an unusually sharp rebuke to President Trump's recent assertion of China's alleged secret assistance to North Korea in their attempts to circumvent its obligations the Chinese Foreign Ministry condemned the tone and substance of American accusations. China however continues to be the main provider of food and fuel to North Korea and has no intention to break its historic ties with the regime in Pyongyang.

CZECH REPUBLIC


Milos Zeman, president of Czech Republic has become first leader of the EU country to call for lifting economic sanctions against Russia. According to Zeman, both the European countries and Russia are losers in that lengthy and futile practice. Zeman might be the first EU head of state to openly voice his opposition to the anti-Russian sanction, but he is not alone because a number of his European counter-parts (specifically in Italy and Austria) may not be saying it outright but nevertheless quietly support this idea.

SAUDI ARABIA


Media reports from Saudi Arabia say Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman has met with the visiting leader of Russia's Chechnya region, Ramzan Kadyrov. The reports said the talks were held at Mina Palace in Jeddah in August 21, with the crown prince and Kadyrov exchanging regards on the occasion of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha. Kadyrov has made private visits to Saudi Arabia and several other Middle Eastern countries in recent years, leading commentators to conclude that Russia is using the head of the mostly Muslim-populated North Caucasus region to promote Kremlin interests among the influential leaders of the Arab world. Saudi Arabia has recently increased its investments in Chechnia's oil industry and number of religious institution, mosques, Islamic schools and cultural centers.


THE AUTHORS


Ilya Gerol, former foreign editor of the Citizen in Ottawa, syndicated columnist in Canadian, US and European media specializing in international affairs. His particular area of expertise includes Russia, Eurasian Economic Union, Eastern and Central Europe.  Ilya Gerol has written several books, one of them, The Manipulators, had become a textbook on relations of media and society.

During his career in the Canadian Foreign Service, Gilles Breton had three assignments at the Canadian Embassy in Moscow. His first posting there began during the Soviet period, in 1983. His last was from 2008 to 2012 as Minister-Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission. He also served as Deputy Director responsible for Canada’s relations with Russia from 2000 to 2008. As an international civil servant, he was Deputy Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights in Warsaw from 1994 to 1997.




Tuesday, July 31, 2018

Issue 21

THE BRETON/GEROLNEWSLETTER




HELSINKI SUMMIT: NEW INSIGHTS AFTER THE DUST HAS SETTLED


Presidents Trump and Putin, Helsinki, July 16th
©President of Russia Website


Now, as the wave of indignation and wide-ranging accusations against Trump, not all of them evidently unfounded, has subsided, we can calmly discuss the outcome of that controversial meeting. Former State Secretary Henry Kissinger recently said that the Helsinki summit had to take place in any event, yet Trump's approach, as all of his foreign policy in general, marks the beginning of a new geopolitical era. Unfortunately, Kissinger added tongue in cheek, Trump most likely is not even aware of it. 

Trump, in his awkward ways, is trying to re-introduce a series of bilateral agreements by circumventing old political and military alliances. Some of them were introduced a long time ago at a time of totally different political realities and, according to Trump's thinking, exist mainly due to American financial and military assistance. As well, the Administration in its heart of hearts believes the real threat to the West comes from a re-surging China, not Russia.

In fact the Helsinki Summit had two agendas; one for the immediate public consumption that included Russian involvement in American elections (Trump agreed with Putin that there was no involvement by Russians at the state level, though later under pressure Trump said he misspoke), cooperation on Syria in connection with the security of Israel.

Two weeks after the summit we are beginning to gather more information of the most important part of that meeting-what was said behind closed doors. Trump and Putin made some attempts to find a compromise on the most acute crisis in Europe, the one that divides West and Russia more than anything else,-Ukraine. Mike Pompeo informed the Senate that Trump and Putin agreed to disagree on the Ukrainian issue. Moscow suggested holding a referendum in Donbass (that includes two unrecognized Donetsk and Lugansk republics) under international supervision on the political future of that region. Washington in turn offered to provide 20 to 40 thousand international peacekeepers for the Donbass region and international administration without any NATO or Russian representation.

There was no agreement reached on that issue, but at least it could be offered to Ukraine for consideration and discussed at the upcoming Normandy format meeting between foreign ministry representatives of France, Germany, Ukraine and Russia.

Not widely publicized but discussed during the summit's closed door session was the nuclear disarmament issue.

The New START treaty signed between then Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and then U.S. President Barack Obama in 2010 will not survive automatically on its own. The agreement, which reduced the number of strategic nuclear weapons to 700 deployed launchers and 1,550 warheads, is set to n expire on February 5, 2021, if it is not prolonged by decision of the parties. Should this come to pass, the multi polar international system will be thrown into chaos.

To prevent a disastrous clash, the two countries need to maintain and strengthen the arms-control safety net. This also includes resolving disputes over the implementation of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) a cornerstone of European security. That is why it is necessary to resume the Russia-US dialogue that will lead to official negotiations. For now, the agenda should be narrow, prioritizing three key issues: the prolongation of the New START treaty, the preservation of the INF Treaty, and the prevention of dangerous military accidents.

With this in mind, and brushing aside internal American squabbles and concerns, real or not, on the merits of the Russian involvement in 2016 American elections, the Trump administration had decided to invite Vladimir Putin to Washington for another summit where those concerns, mainly nuclear safety, reduction and arms race control would be high on the agenda.

However the next summit between Trump and Putin was abruptly postponed by the Administration in order to give Mueller Inquiry time to conclude its investigation into Russian election meddling. As John Bolton, National Security Adviser, put it: “The President believes that the next bilateral meeting with President Putin should take place after the Russia witch hunt is over, so we have agreed that it will be after January 1st, 2019".


Presidents Trump and Putin, Helsinki, July 16th
©President of Russia Website


--o--

IRAN-SYRIA ISRAEL FOOTNOTE


Donald Trump may like to present himself as the best friend of Israel. In the discussions around military developments in the south of Syria and their impact on the security of Israel, it is, however, far from clear that he is the main player. President Putin and Prime Minister Netanyahu have been frequent interlocutors and seem to have developed a strong relationship. Once they have had their discussion about what to with Iran in Syria, one has the impression that they will play Trump, but not expect him to influence decisions. This leaves Trump to do the posturing, that he does rather well. Unfortunately, it also can incite him to believe he has to take the initiative on the broader issues underpinning the US-Iran conflict. His recent offer to meet Iranian President Rouhani is consistent with his belief that he personally can resolve any problem. After North Korea, US national security specialists may be in for another interesting ride.



--o--

LIAR, LIAR OR MR. TRUMP’S TRUTH MANAGEMENT SKILLS


After his controversial statement during the press conference following his meeting with Vladimir Putin in Helsinki on July 16th, Donald Trump was accused of high treason by John Brennan, the former head of the CIA, for appearing to believe the Russian President more than his own intelligence services on the matter of Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.
Despite Trump’s later explanation about having meant to use a double negative, it is abundantly clear that he indeed believes Putin more than US intelligence. For him, though, this is not a matter of disloyalty to the US security establishment. This is a matter of him believing what suits him best, what he wants to believe. The US intelligence story would suggest that Russia influenced the outcome of the Presidential election in several ways. For Trump the legitimacy of his presidency and the belief that he won “hugely” matter more than the truth, in this case as in many others.

Ironically, one learns more about the Russian meddling in the 2016 election from Putin’s interview with Fox News later on the day of the Summit than from any of Trump’s statements. Whereas Putin expectedly denies any official Russian government involvement in the election, he avoids, as before, denying involvement by Russians in the hacking of Democratic National Committee (DNC) email servers. Instead, rather than addressing the issue head on, he keeps insisting on the fact that the emails that were eventually made public are a true record. In other words, Russians most likely did it, but, by getting access to the emails and publishing them, only made the truth available to the American public. In Putin’s mind, this is clearly a lesser sin, if one at all. Whether Trump likes it or not, Russian hackers exposing the duplicity of the DNC and, separately but even more, FBI Director Comey’s last minute flip-flop on Hillary Clinton’s emails had an influence on the election outcome. By comparison, the alleged Russian use of social networks appears much less significant in terms of its overall scope and impact.


Presient Putin interviewed by Fox News/Chris Wallace, July 16th
©President of Russia Website


Putin’s virtual back-door admission of a general Russian responsibility for hacking the DNC servers, but not of a Russian government specific action, would be good enough for Donald Trump, even though it would be difficult for him to admit that he owes even part of his Electoral College victory to Russia. For Trump’s adversaries, confining Russian responsibility to one successful but relatively circumscribed action and attributing it to non-government actors is far from satisfactory. To many, it might indeed be inconceivable to believe that there are non-state actors in Putin’s Russia. The incident also inconveniently exposes some Democratic Party leaders’ questionable behaviour. One should bear in mind, however, that Robert Mueller’s investigation mandate includes finding possible links between Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russian government, the collusion that Trump constantly denies. Ultimately, despite the serious allegations supported by US intelligence and already 15 months of work, Mueller may never find anything that can reasonably be prosecuted in a US court, but the scrutiny to which it exposes Trump’s entourage has already revealed enough turpitude and poor judgment to justify its continuation. For Trump’s political opponents, the Mueller inquiry serves too many purposes to be abandoned. To them, the fact that the current climate prevents the President from taking any significant, even necessary, new Russia-related initiative and that it essentially makes US-Russia relations dependent on a highly partisan US debate is only collateral damage. The above-mentioned postponement of the proposed Putin visit to Washington is only an example of that.

--o--

TRUMP'S TRADE WARS-UPS AND DOWNS


After announcing the raise of tariffs on aluminum and steel produced in Canada, China, Russia and Europe President Trump continues to threaten to introduce even harsher measures against European cars imported to the US. The main target of his trade hostilities has become China; he announced his intentions to apply higher tariffs to all goods imported from China. Trump's calculations are based on the fact that China is no position to reciprocate in kind; Chinese exports to the US by far exceed the stream of American goods to China. Yet Beijing, according to insiders, is preparing to retaliate in different way: Chinese are ready to withdraw almost a trillion dollars’ worth of investments in the US economy and banks.

In a most unexpected twist of his global trade war, Trump recently announced that he could be ready to abolish all tariffs if other trade partners would do the same.

Jean-Claude Juncker, the chairman of European council, had commented: every madness has a system. The correctness of this statement had been immediately confirmed by Trump's sudden suggestion, during his meeting with Juncker in the White House, that all tariffs between US and EU could be abolished should both sides agree to it. In fact such a radical measure cannot even be implemented without long and painstaking negotiations. The situation is made even more unrealistic by the fact that tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China are already in place.

--o--

UKRAINE  UPDATE


There may be some perverse irony, but there is also some astuteness in the alleged Russian proposal to hold a popular democratic referendum in the rebel regions of Eastern Ukraine to ascertain the wishes of the population as to its political future. Russia was not unaware of the fact that the proposal would be met with a negative reaction in Kyiv. Its rejection is not a surprise. It, however, serves to highlight the fact that there is no political support in Kyiv for a negotiated political settlement of the conflict with the rebel regions, to the point where direct political dialogue with the leaders of the rebel regions is anathema. In that context, the idea of the referendum would be formally to bypass the rebel authorities and hear directly from the people living in the region and give them a voice in the attempts to settle the conflict. Such a “concession” is not currently acceptable to Kyiv authorities. With the presidential and parliamentary elections around the corner, the likelihood of a substantial change in Kyiv’s position is even more unlikely. There is, however, the outside chance that one influential oligarch might pick up on the idea. The Russian proposal, in any event, puts Kyiv on the defensive. As a central government apparently unwilling to hear the views of the inhabitants of one of its regions, it puts Ukraine in the same camp as Spain in its conflict with Catalonian independence partisans. All in all, Russia has lost nothing by making the proposal, but has scored if nothing else a small political argument.

The allegations to the effect that the current authorities in Kyiv harbour a significant number of fascists, anti-Semitic or xenophobic elements have often been written off as part of the Moscow propaganda. Granted, the composition of the Ukrainian government and the historical views of some of its members do not change substantially the nature of its current conflict with Russia. Nevertheless, the glorification of certain WWII actors that are considered in Ukraine as national heroes, but are considered elsewhere, including in other countries such as Poland and Russia, as war criminals will not cease to be a most controversial and sensitive issue. So is the relative greater frequency of a political discourse that is associated with far-right ideas, even though it should be noted that such a discourse also exists in neighbouring countries. The recent occurrence of racially-motivated incidents and the publication of articles in the Western press condemning them has highlighted the problem and the fact that it is not exclusively a matter of Russian propaganda. This in itself will not change the course of events or the support Ukraine unconditionally receives from its North American allies. It can, however, have a long-term impact on the public opinion debate in which Ukraine has been doing very well so far.

On the separate matter of Crimea, cracks are continuing to appear in the relatively unanimous support Ukraine initially received. Matteo Salvini, Italy’s Interior Minister and once political ally of Marine Le Pen, created an uproar by his statement that referred to “some historically Russian zones with Russian culture and traditions which legitimately belong to the Russian Federation” as well as to the legitimacy of the 2014 Crimea referendum. He was critical of the Crimea-related sanctions calling them “not useful and as hurting Italian exports”. He also went as far as to call the 2014 Ukrainian revolution a "pseudo-revolution financed by foreign powers". Italian Foreign Minister Enzo Moavero Milanesi swiftly replied by reiterating Italy’s support for the EU position on Crimea and that Rome "respects" Ukraine's right to sovereignty.

We had already reported on President Trump’s remarks about Crimea “being Russian because they speak Russian there”. In the aftermath of the Putin Trump Summit, Secretary of State Pompeo had to reiterate publicly and firmly the US position on Crimea. Canada did it a few days later. Rumours will nevertheless continue to circulate about a possible Crimea/Donbass trade-off between Ukraine and Russia. Such a trade-off remains unlikely, at least for the foreseeable future.


President Poroshenko, Mrs. Poroshenko leading the procession
Kyiv, July28th
©President of Ukraine Website


The public celebrations on the occasion of the1030th anniversary of the adoption of Christianity in lands that are now part of Belarus, Ukraine and Russia highlighted once more the political sensitivity of jurisdictional issues in the Ukrainian religious domain. On the occasion of this solemn anniversary, two separate processions were organised in Kyiv, the first one by the Church that remains affiliated to the Moscow Patriarchate, the second one by the two independent Ukrainian churches. There was a large difference of opinion between the organisers and the police authorities as to the level of attendance for the first procession (250,000 vs 25,000). President Poroshenko attended the second one and reiterated the call for the recognition of an independent Ukrainian Orthodox Church by the Patriarch of Constantinople. Yet, Poroshenko’s activism on religious matters does not seem to have had any effect on his popular rating.

--o--

BRICS-ONE OF THE ALTERNATIVES IN THE MULTI-POLAR WORLD

BRICS family photo, leaders andi nvited participants, July 27th


The July summit of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) in South Africa stressed the necessity to develop closer cooperation between its members with the objective to become a financial and industrial hub that could attract more members and partners. The financial locomotive of this organization is naturally China. Together with Russia, Beijing will increase the role of high technology in that group in order to work towards some competitive level with such alliances as the EU and ASEAN.

According to the latest information Turkish President Erdogan applied for his country's membership in this group. Apart from the substantial economic weight that Turkey carries, Ankara joining BRICS would solidify this alliance's political significance. This turn of events takes on special significance in light of Turkey's repeated statements that the country may consider leaving NATO.

--o--

OIL AND POLITICS


Rebels in Yemen attacked two Saudi oil tankers in Bab-el-Mandeb strait and forced them to return to port. Riyadh decided to take their oil through the Red Sea, a lengthier route that will surely increase transportation costs and consequently oil prices at world markets. At the same time India, one of the most stable buyers of Iranian oil has announced its decision to decrease its purchase of Iranian crude in favor of Saudi or Russian suppliers. Major international industrial companies hastily retreating from Iran are not even waiting for November 4th, the deadline for American sanctions against Iran to come into effect. This has already brought the Iranian currency to its lowest level in 15 years. The Iranian government reacted by introducing strict hard currency exchange rules. This in turn will contribute even more to the currency's downfall and worsen the economic situation in the country. There is little doubt that Iranians will come out to the streets to protest economic hardships. Many political observers believe that Tehran will provoke a military clash or even a war at Hormuz or Bab-el-Mandeb straits, to deflect popular attention by whipping out nationalism, to suppress dissent and also to help increase oil prices.







--o--

WORLD CUP TOURISM


For Russia as the host country, this year’s edition of the World Cup of Football was a success, only mitigated by the defeat of its national team in quarter finals. The fact that the defeat was in overtime, at the hands of Croatia, and that the Russian team accomplished much more than expected softened the blow.

Media widely reported that a large number of the first-time visitors to Russia were suitably impressed by the welcoming nature of the country and by the efficient organisation of the tournament. Many observed on the contrast between the image of Russia as presented in Western media and the reality they could observe with their very eyes. President Putin himself could not resist mentioning it. The impact of the World Cup 2018 on the image of Russia will not wipe out overnight any disagreement Russia may have with its Western adversaries. It may however affect the tone of the world media coverage in the long term.

--o--

PERSON OF THE MONTH:

 VIKTOR ORBAN





The controversial Hungarian Prime Minister has become one of the most talked about political leaders in Europe. Media likes to describe him as "Soft Eurosceptic". On some issues he is not so soft: he leads the anti-Ukrainian campaign in NATO and the EU on account of the alleged discrimination against Hungarian speakers in the Carpathian region of Ukraine. Orban leads the Eastern European opposition to the mass influx of illegal migrants from the Middle East, Africa and other Third World countries. His opposition to EU immigration policies, widely condemned by most Western countries, is based on his vision of security and cultural balance inside Hungary.
Orban is largely supported in Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Poland and by some populist parties in Western Europe.

Born in 1963, Viktor Orban transformed himself from a young communist at the age of 15 to an established conservative leader of his country. He maintains a balance between Hungary's membership in NATO and the EU with good relations with Moscow. Also, in spite of some accusations of antisemitism, Orban became the first European leader to officially visit and pray at the Western wall in contravention of long standing EU policy that considers this part of Jerusalem occupied territory.

--o--

BRIEFLY NOTED


RUSSIA


The unpopular pension reform that was cleverly introduced without too much fanfare during the World Cup of Football has now triggered mass demonstrations in Russia cities. The protests are led by the Communist Party and other left wing political organizations that are coming back from political oblivion by riding the wave of current rallies. The Russian government, bearing in mind historical precedents in the country, takes such demonstrations seriously. It was therefore decided to re-work certain provisions of the reform and to delay the vote in Parliament.

UKRAINE


According to sources in Minsk where the contact group on Donbass conflict had an emergency meeting there is a planned exchange of political prisoners between Russia and Ukraine slated for August 2018. This means that Oleg Sentsov, the Ukrainian film director who was sentenced by a Russian court to 20 years for "terrorist activities" and whose release was demanded by many across the world finally could be freed.

RUSSIA-SYRIA 


Meeting in the Russian Black Sea resort of Sochi, representatives of Russia, Iran, and Turkey have kicked off two days of talks on issues related to the war in Syria. The gathering comes as Turkey announced on July 29 that it is planning to hold a summit with France, Germany, and Russia in early September to discuss the Syrian conflict and other regional issues. The Russian delegation in Sochi is headed by the Kremlin's special envoy for Syria, Aleksandr Lavrentyev. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Ansari and his Turkish counterpart, Sedat Onal, were also expected to attend, along with the UN special envoy for Syria, Staffan de Mistura, and representatives of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government.

ARMENIA


Former ex-president Kocharyan was detained in Yerevan on charges of bribery and money laundering. This announcement comes amid large scare anti-corruption measures by the new Government of Nikol Pashinyan, that came to power on the wave of mass street demonstrations. Scores of current and former Armenian politicians were recently purged or arrested on various corruption and abuse of power charges.

KAZAKHSTAN-KYRGYZSTAN 


Kazakh Defense Minister Saken Zhasuzaqov traveled to Bishkek on July 25, making the first official visit by a Kazakh defense chief to Kyrgyzstan since the two Central Asian nations gained independence in the 1991 after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Zhasuzaqov's talks with the chief of the Kyrgyz armed forces' General Staff, Raiymberdi Duishenbiev, focused on regional security and military cooperation, the Kyrgyz military said. An agreement on military intelligence cooperation was signed after the talks.
The two countries are members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) along with Russia, Armenia, Belarus, and Tajikistan.

SOUTH OSSETIA

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has met with the visiting head of the Georgian breakaway region of South Ossetia on July 23rd, two months after Damascus become one of only a handful of countries to recognize the region's declared independence.

Assad's office revealed that Anatoly Bibilov, the de facto president of South Ossetia, was in Syria on a three-day visit. Assad thanked him for backing his government in its seven-year civil war against various rebels and for recognizing Syria's "sovereignty" and "unity." Venezuela, Nicaragua, and the Pacific island of Nauru are the only other states that have also recognized Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states.


--o--

THE AUTHORS

Ilya Gerol, former foreign editor of the Citizen in Ottawa, syndicated columnist in Canadian, US and European media specializing in international affairs. His particular area of expertise includes Russia, Eurasian Economic Union, Eastern and Central Europe.  Ilya Gerol has written several books, one of them, The Manipulators, had become a textbook on relations of media and society.

During his career in the Canadian Foreign Service, Gilles Breton had three assignments at the Canadian Embassy in Moscow. His first posting there began during the Soviet period, in 1983. His last was from 2008 to 2012 as Minister-Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission. He also served as Deputy Director responsible for Canada’s relations with Russia from 2000 to 2008. As an international civil servant, he was Deputy Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights in Warsaw from 1994 to 1997.



Friday, June 29, 2018

Issue 20

THE BRETON/GEROL NEWSLETTER


SEASON OF THE SUMMITS : AFTER CHARLEVOIX, FROM SINGAPORE TO HELSINKI THROUGH BRUSSELS



President Trump arriving at the G7 Summit in Charlevoix, June 8th
©Facebook
President Trump is scheduled to attend the NATO summit on July 12th. On the occasion he is bound to encounter serious disagreements with US allies from old Europe. The main difficulty is the financial contribution of other member states along with the growing US unwillingness to pay the lion's share of the organisation’s budget. New tensions may arise if Trump insists on member states fulfilling their financial obligations by contributing 2% of their budgets to defense. Immediately after the NATO meeting Trump will fly to Helsinki where he will sit down with Vladimir Putin. It will be the first official summit of the two leaders. They previously met only briefly on the sidelines of various conferences. The major topics of discussion will range from restoration of nuclear restraint, the Syrian situation and the conflict in Ukraine as well as the overall improvement in relations between old Cold War foes.

Any possible improvement in relations between the two nuclear super-states is a positive step. However, due to a lot of skepticism or outright opposition to such overtures from the American political establishment and key American allies, primarily Great Britain, Poland and the Baltic States, not to mention Ukraine itself, it is hard to foresee a breakthrough. This is not easy to admit, but, as for the US political establishment, it was rather astute on Trump’s part to have his meeting with Putin arranged by John Bolton, the one US Republican politician who could have otherwise been the most critical of such a move. 

Ultimately, one thing is clear: in the geopolitical sense if we are to overcome this chaotic period and lay foundations for conflict resolution in the Middle East and Eastern Ukraine, participation of both Moscow and Washington and productive interaction between them is needed.

On the specific issue of Syria, the question whether there is much left to discuss is worth asking. The Syrian government is slowly, but surely, regaining control of its territory, one region at a time. Some Arab commentators have even already observed that the US is abandoning its Syrian opposition allies. Syria in itself may no longer be the real issue, but it provides a useful cover to discuss the security concerns of Israel as well as the concerns about Turkey and its recently re-elected President. Iran was not mentioned by the US president in his first comments about the upcoming summit. For Trump himself, it might not be such an enticing prospect to discuss the Iran nuclear deal, that he just denounced, with one of its steadfast supporters.

Another issue of utmost importance for the agenda will be an attempt to craft some sort of cyberwarfare "rules of the road", or at least a truce, considering the stakes involved. While there is no doubt that Russian actors tried to interfere in the 2016 US presidential election, the US also has incredible cyberwarfare and information warfare capabilities that could create havoc across the globe. There is little doubt that the next major conflict will start in cyberspace. The US and Russia must begin to work together to draft an agreement, one that hopefully virtually all other nations can support, that limits hostile state actions in cyberspace.

No government should attack another nation’s election system, banking, infrastructure, hospitals or other critical systems that depend on the Internet. Just one false move, either by accident or on purpose, could spark a crisis where lives could be placed in harm’s way, and lead to a shooting war. In the worst case scenario this could escalate to nuclear conflict. The fundamental problem has been, however, that in the absence of a minimum of mutual trust, neither side is in a position to begin sharing information about what it knows and what it can do. 


As in traditional arms control negotiation, it may well be necessary to initiate the process through confidence-building measures. 

--o--

CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM

The euphoria of the Singapore summit between Donald Trump and the North Korean leader who is often referred to by his people as  "Yŏngmyŏng-han Tongji" (영명한 동지), which loosely translates to "Brilliant Comrade" is fading. Aside from blowing up two nuclear testing sites and some underground facilities, the North so far has not disclosed locations of other key sites and has not even begun returning remains of American servicemen killed during the Korean War. Moreover, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report, satellite imagery shows that North Korea began upgrading its main nuclear research center and adjacent site. Meanwhile Kim visited Beijing to update Chairman Xi Jinping on the results of the Singapore summit. China, not waiting for international sanctions against North Korea to be lifted, has resumed purchase of Korean coal and eased certain food deliveries to its peculiar neighbor. 


Just as it was emphasized by more knowledgeable commentators, not prone to sensationalism, it will be a long process with many ups and downs before the two main objectives of denuclearization and a formal peace treaty between both Koreans can be achieved. 


Presidents Kim Jong-un and Trump, Singapore, June 12th
©Facebook



--o--

STRUGGLING ALLIANCES IN THE AGE OF TRUMP



G8 leaders in Charlevoix, June 8th
©Facebook

The established system of high-level consultations, such as the G7 (formerly G8) and G-20, political military alliances such as NATO, international treaties such as NAFTA and other multilateral and bilateral free trade agreements, and finally the WTO, all of them, looked unassailable not so not long ago.  They now begin to look shaky and vulnerable. It is easy and fashionable to lay blame at the feet of Donald Trump. After all he is erratic, unpredictable, not very knowledgeable and has questionable advisers around him. The situation is by far more complicated than that. Trump continues to find support among a sizable part of the American electorate, his own party and some in Europe (particularly in the Central and Eastern part of the continent). Newly elected populist and right of center governments in several European countries share a similar view of the world order with Donald Trump, especially when it comes to immigration and anti-globalism in the economic sphere.

Relations with Russia have also become a divisive point in the Western alliance. When in Quebec for the G7 Summit, Trump suddenly expressed his support for re-inviting Russia back to the G7, making it again the G8. Only Italy did not object. Privately however France and Germany are looking for an opportunity to make this possible, provided there is some real progress in the Ukrainian conflict.

Canada, under PM Justin Trudeau, lost the ability to see nuances in the complex world of international politics, banking solely on its uncompromising support for Ukraine and ignoring certain elements of realpolitik and geopolitical realities. This makes current Canadian stand within the G-7 smack of provincialism. If you add to this the unfolding economic drama between Canada and US where Canada holds a much weaker hand and faces some tough choices ahead, one is inclined to think that things will most likely get even worse before they get better. As for the future of the Western alliance, at least in the short term, it looks bleak. 


--o--

OLD AGE IS NOT JOY (OLD RUSSIAN SAYING)


The age at which Russian residents can receive a government old age pension is one of the few things that have not changed since Soviet times. Men can still retire at 60, women at 55. The government has now proposed to raise the pension age progressively, beginning in 2019, to bring it to 65 for men by 2028 and 63 for women by 2034.




Government authorities are well aware of the unpopularity of such a change. Canadians will recall that one of the measures taken by the new Trudeau government in 2016 was to cancel the Harper government decision to raise the pension age from 65 to 67. In Canada, the idea of raising the pension age was not overly popular, but it did not create the same level of controversy and debate as the current Russian government proposal. President Putin himself is confronted with his own 2005 statement that he would not countenance a change in pension age. The statement was made at a time when the Russian government was going through the also unpopular process of monetizing some of the social benefits that were a legacy of Soviet practices.

Government pensions are one of the most difficult issues left over from Soviet times and one around which there has probably been the greatest popular resentment. Soviet-era pensions were relatively generous. Nowadays, more important than the occasional delays in payment, the main problem is that the value of the pension itself, for a person retiring at this time, no longer corresponds to the income that could allow a person to live comfortably. Yet, it is still a considerable burden for the state as there is no dedicated pension fund from which to draw. Touching an acquis social such as early age for retirement is not only controversial for the fact that it affects a fundamental right of the worker. In a country where life expectancy overall has grown but still is at 71.6, the argument is being made that a large proportion of men whose life expectancy is lower than that of women would never receive a pension. The counter argument is that life expectancy is on the rise and that the expectation is that Russia is well on its way to catch up. That is the justification for raising the pension age to the accepted international level in order to protect the long-term viability of the system.

The government is trying to sell its proposal by offering assurances that pension amounts will continue to grow significantly in coming years. It also is taking measures to protect the pension system by modernizing it and by making it more similar to pension systems in the rest of the industrial world. This being said, the issue will be remaining at the top of the political agenda for the foreseeable future.


--o--


GAS GUZZLERS




Along with Saudi Arabia and the US, Russia is, year in year out, one of the three largest oil producers. The government recently announced two measures that are related to oil production and consumption. The first part of the plan is a so-called fiscal maneuver that will change the structure of taxation for the oil industry. The rather complex exercise is intended to bring substantially more revenue to the government, facilitate modernisation of the industry as well as promote exports. It also incidentally is intended to help companies that have been subjected to Western sanctions. The whole matter is, however, still the subject of negotiations between the government and oil sector companies.

The second part of the plan is to reduce excise taxes on fuel, creating a budget shortfall of approximately USD$2.2 billion, in order to ensure the stability of gasoline prices on the retail market, a matter of some serious concern since the beginning of 2018. The intent of this second measure is to appease consumers. It may however be seen as encouraging the consumption of more fossil fuels.

--o--

OUT OF UKRAINE ISSUES


The stalemate in the conflict between Kyiv and its Eastern rebel regions means not only that the issue ends to drop from world attention. It also means that the discussion in Ukraine and in Russia tends to shift to issues that are not necessarily central to the conflict, but have large symbolic value. The completion of the bridge linking Crimea to the Russian mainland comes to mind. One could understand that this engineering achievement would receive considerable attention in Russia and would be greeted there with suitable satisfaction. In Ukraine, the news was received with more resignation than anger and soon became the subject of mockery directed at the public figures who had stated that the construction of such a bridge was impossible.

The Crimean Bridge
© Preisent of Russia Website


On an issue that has little to do with the Ukraine-Russia conflict, there were in Ukraine many doubters about the capacity for Russia to host successful Football World Cup events. The idea that Russia might fail at this would have comforted those who tend to view that anything that is good for Russia must be bad for Ukraine, and that the reverse is also true. There were even rumours that Ukraine may take advantage of the Russian leadership being focussed on entertaining a large number of foreign guests to launch a new government-led military offensive in Eastern Ukraine. Although there was increased activity on the front line, no new significant military action was undertaken. There was in fact renewed diplomatic activity. We now even have yet another ceasefire agreement set to begin on July 1st.

We had noted before that there were rumours of frequent phone calls between Presidents Poroshenko and Putin. Through their web sites, the two presidents acknowledged that they indeed spoke by phone on June 21st. The focus of the conversation seems to have been on the issue of political prisoners detained by both sides. The lack of success of the discussion was confirmed by Poroshenko immediately thereafter, as he ordered sanctions against most Russian political parties.
With the announcement of a Putin-Trump summit in July, and Trump saying that Ukraine will be on the agenda, Ukrainian authorities may experience some trepidation. Having seen what happened in the US-North Korea discussions and having heard the rumour that Trump told his G7 counterparts in Charlevoix that “Crimea is Russian because everyone who lives there speaks Russian”, there may indeed be some cause for concern on their part.

Of note for Canadians, the Putin-Trump summit removes another leader from the short list of heads of government who are not in direct contact with Vladimir Putin: Theresa May and Justin Trudeau are the ones left. Despite the recent silence about the Skrypal affair, the matter still justifies May’s reluctance. As for the Poroshenko-Putin phone call, it would seem to undermine the Ukrainian rationale for asking Canada not to engage with Russia.

--o--

THE WORLD CUP IN RUSSIA, SPORT BUT NOT ONLY

So far the Russians have excelled in organizing this World Cup. The logistics were not trivial: 11 cities, some 3,000 kilometers apart, covering 3 time zones, and hundreds of thousands of tourists from all corners of the world. Security, safety and services, according to participants and journalists, have been top notch as well. Previously feared Russian soccer hooligans are also kept in check. Many British soccer fans, on the advice of their Foreign Service, decided to not to go, but those who went have experienced a warm welcome at the sites where England played. Many Russians even cheered for the English team. 




This World Cup also has helped Russia conduct some very important diplomatic activities. Putin was seen at his VIP box with the likes of Crown Prince Salman of Saudi Arabia, President of Azerbaijan Aliev and newly elected PM of Armenia Pashinyan. In fact Putin managed to bring Aliev and Pashinyan together for a handshake during a game in an attempt re-start the negotiation about the endless conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh. Putin also extended an  invitation to Netanyahu and Mahmoud Abbas. Netanyahu has yet to accept, but Abbas already confirmed his attendance. There is little doubt that a lot of less visible yet significant meetings are taking place on the sidelines of this tournament.

--o--


PERSON OF THE MONTH: MOHAMMAD BIN SALMAN BIN ABDULAZIZ AL SAUD


©Wikipedia
The 32-year old Crown Prince Salman of Saudi Arabia has introduced several revolutionary reforms in his conservative kingdom: legalizing rights of women to drive, female concert performances, hiring women in civil service, including the police force. He also significantly restricted the powers of the religious police, also known as vice squads. On the international scene he directly confronted Iran for its involvement in Yemen's civil war and together with Israel strongly lobbied president Trump to withdraw from the Iranian nuclear deal, going as far as to say that if Iran will be allowed to move towards nuclear weapons, Saudis will do the same. In fact Prince Salman almost makes no secret of his strategic alliance with Israel in its confrontation with Iran. He twice hosted in Riyadh Yossi Cohen, the head of the Mossad (Israeli Intelligence Agency) and other Israeli security officials. Recently it has been rumored that Bin Salman secretly met with Israeli PM Netanyahu. In a surprise visit to the World Cup in Moscow for the opening game between Russia and Saudi Arabia, he stoically and with humor endured the Russian thrashing of his team (final score was 5-0 for Russia), while discussing oil business, Iran and Syria with Vladimir Putin. 

--o--

BRIEFLY NOTED


ARMENIA


Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan unleashed an unprecedented anti-corruption campaign. His security forces have arrested Manvel Grigoryan, the previously untouchable Defense Minister and several other key bureaucrats and relatives of former Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan.

This is only the beginning as indictments are being prepared against the mayor of Yerevan (who happens to be the son of the arrested defense minister) and scores of others.

TURKMENISTAN


Turkmenistan introduced tough new austerity measures: food rationing, currency exchange control and limiting electricity use by private citizens. The reason for such draconian measures is the ongoing financial crisis affecting such mega projects as new pipelines and construction of southbound roads.

BELARUS


President Lukashenko met with EU representatives to announce that his country was ready for political reforms that could bring Minsk closer to the standards of European Union. He also stated that Belarus would not object to Ukraine joining NATO in the future, an unusual view for a close Russian ally

GEORGIA


A Georgian court sentenced in absentia former President Mikheil Saakashvili to 6 year imprisonment for abuse of power. It is believed that the real objective of Georgian authorities was to prevent the eccentric, yet popular politician from returning to his native country. He is currently residing in the Netherlands, but is still actively involved in political controversy in both Georgia and Ukraine.

UZBEKISTAN


Uzbekistan has emphasized its readiness to host direct peace talks between the government of neighboring Afghanistan and the Taliban, after both sides announced a cease-fire for the Eid al-Fitr holiday. Although the Taliban withdrew from the ceasefire itself, the negotiations in Tashkent are ongoing. The Foreign Ministry of Uzbekistan confirms its full readiness to create, at any stage of the peace process, all the necessary conditions for setting up direct talks between the government of Afghanistan and the Taliban. The former Soviet republic is seeking to raise its international profile as part of President Shavkat Mirziyoyev’s campaign to open up the nation of 32 million after decades of isolation.

NORTH MACEDONIA 

The Macedonian and Greek parliaments ratified a long-awaited agreement to re-name the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as North Macedonia. Since the collapse of Yugoslavia, Greece refused to recognize independent Macedonia because it claimed for one of its regions the historic name of Macedonia. After years of tortuous negotiations both sides reached a compromise that culminated in the country of Macedonia renaming itself to North Macedonia. However, the President of Macedonia has refused, so far, to ratify the name change.


THE AUTHORS

Ilya Gerol, former foreign editor of the Citizen in Ottawa, syndicated columnist in Canadian, US and European media specializing in international affairs. His particular area of expertise includes Russia, Eurasian Economic Union, Eastern and Central Europe.  Ilya Gerol has written several books, one of them, The Manipulators, had become a textbook on relations of media and society.

During his career in the Canadian Foreign Service, Gilles Breton had three assignments at the Canadian Embassy in Moscow. His first posting there began during the Soviet period, in 1983. His last was from 2008 to 2012 as Minister-Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission. He also served as Deputy Director responsible for Canada’s relations with Russia from 2000 to 2008. As an international civil servant, he was Deputy Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights in Warsaw from 1994 to 1997.