Friday, June 29, 2018

Issue 20

THE BRETON/GEROL NEWSLETTER


SEASON OF THE SUMMITS : AFTER CHARLEVOIX, FROM SINGAPORE TO HELSINKI THROUGH BRUSSELS



President Trump arriving at the G7 Summit in Charlevoix, June 8th
©Facebook
President Trump is scheduled to attend the NATO summit on July 12th. On the occasion he is bound to encounter serious disagreements with US allies from old Europe. The main difficulty is the financial contribution of other member states along with the growing US unwillingness to pay the lion's share of the organisation’s budget. New tensions may arise if Trump insists on member states fulfilling their financial obligations by contributing 2% of their budgets to defense. Immediately after the NATO meeting Trump will fly to Helsinki where he will sit down with Vladimir Putin. It will be the first official summit of the two leaders. They previously met only briefly on the sidelines of various conferences. The major topics of discussion will range from restoration of nuclear restraint, the Syrian situation and the conflict in Ukraine as well as the overall improvement in relations between old Cold War foes.

Any possible improvement in relations between the two nuclear super-states is a positive step. However, due to a lot of skepticism or outright opposition to such overtures from the American political establishment and key American allies, primarily Great Britain, Poland and the Baltic States, not to mention Ukraine itself, it is hard to foresee a breakthrough. This is not easy to admit, but, as for the US political establishment, it was rather astute on Trump’s part to have his meeting with Putin arranged by John Bolton, the one US Republican politician who could have otherwise been the most critical of such a move. 

Ultimately, one thing is clear: in the geopolitical sense if we are to overcome this chaotic period and lay foundations for conflict resolution in the Middle East and Eastern Ukraine, participation of both Moscow and Washington and productive interaction between them is needed.

On the specific issue of Syria, the question whether there is much left to discuss is worth asking. The Syrian government is slowly, but surely, regaining control of its territory, one region at a time. Some Arab commentators have even already observed that the US is abandoning its Syrian opposition allies. Syria in itself may no longer be the real issue, but it provides a useful cover to discuss the security concerns of Israel as well as the concerns about Turkey and its recently re-elected President. Iran was not mentioned by the US president in his first comments about the upcoming summit. For Trump himself, it might not be such an enticing prospect to discuss the Iran nuclear deal, that he just denounced, with one of its steadfast supporters.

Another issue of utmost importance for the agenda will be an attempt to craft some sort of cyberwarfare "rules of the road", or at least a truce, considering the stakes involved. While there is no doubt that Russian actors tried to interfere in the 2016 US presidential election, the US also has incredible cyberwarfare and information warfare capabilities that could create havoc across the globe. There is little doubt that the next major conflict will start in cyberspace. The US and Russia must begin to work together to draft an agreement, one that hopefully virtually all other nations can support, that limits hostile state actions in cyberspace.

No government should attack another nation’s election system, banking, infrastructure, hospitals or other critical systems that depend on the Internet. Just one false move, either by accident or on purpose, could spark a crisis where lives could be placed in harm’s way, and lead to a shooting war. In the worst case scenario this could escalate to nuclear conflict. The fundamental problem has been, however, that in the absence of a minimum of mutual trust, neither side is in a position to begin sharing information about what it knows and what it can do. 


As in traditional arms control negotiation, it may well be necessary to initiate the process through confidence-building measures. 

--o--

CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM

The euphoria of the Singapore summit between Donald Trump and the North Korean leader who is often referred to by his people as  "Yŏngmyŏng-han Tongji" (영명한 동지), which loosely translates to "Brilliant Comrade" is fading. Aside from blowing up two nuclear testing sites and some underground facilities, the North so far has not disclosed locations of other key sites and has not even begun returning remains of American servicemen killed during the Korean War. Moreover, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report, satellite imagery shows that North Korea began upgrading its main nuclear research center and adjacent site. Meanwhile Kim visited Beijing to update Chairman Xi Jinping on the results of the Singapore summit. China, not waiting for international sanctions against North Korea to be lifted, has resumed purchase of Korean coal and eased certain food deliveries to its peculiar neighbor. 


Just as it was emphasized by more knowledgeable commentators, not prone to sensationalism, it will be a long process with many ups and downs before the two main objectives of denuclearization and a formal peace treaty between both Koreans can be achieved. 


Presidents Kim Jong-un and Trump, Singapore, June 12th
©Facebook



--o--

STRUGGLING ALLIANCES IN THE AGE OF TRUMP



G8 leaders in Charlevoix, June 8th
©Facebook

The established system of high-level consultations, such as the G7 (formerly G8) and G-20, political military alliances such as NATO, international treaties such as NAFTA and other multilateral and bilateral free trade agreements, and finally the WTO, all of them, looked unassailable not so not long ago.  They now begin to look shaky and vulnerable. It is easy and fashionable to lay blame at the feet of Donald Trump. After all he is erratic, unpredictable, not very knowledgeable and has questionable advisers around him. The situation is by far more complicated than that. Trump continues to find support among a sizable part of the American electorate, his own party and some in Europe (particularly in the Central and Eastern part of the continent). Newly elected populist and right of center governments in several European countries share a similar view of the world order with Donald Trump, especially when it comes to immigration and anti-globalism in the economic sphere.

Relations with Russia have also become a divisive point in the Western alliance. When in Quebec for the G7 Summit, Trump suddenly expressed his support for re-inviting Russia back to the G7, making it again the G8. Only Italy did not object. Privately however France and Germany are looking for an opportunity to make this possible, provided there is some real progress in the Ukrainian conflict.

Canada, under PM Justin Trudeau, lost the ability to see nuances in the complex world of international politics, banking solely on its uncompromising support for Ukraine and ignoring certain elements of realpolitik and geopolitical realities. This makes current Canadian stand within the G-7 smack of provincialism. If you add to this the unfolding economic drama between Canada and US where Canada holds a much weaker hand and faces some tough choices ahead, one is inclined to think that things will most likely get even worse before they get better. As for the future of the Western alliance, at least in the short term, it looks bleak. 


--o--

OLD AGE IS NOT JOY (OLD RUSSIAN SAYING)


The age at which Russian residents can receive a government old age pension is one of the few things that have not changed since Soviet times. Men can still retire at 60, women at 55. The government has now proposed to raise the pension age progressively, beginning in 2019, to bring it to 65 for men by 2028 and 63 for women by 2034.




Government authorities are well aware of the unpopularity of such a change. Canadians will recall that one of the measures taken by the new Trudeau government in 2016 was to cancel the Harper government decision to raise the pension age from 65 to 67. In Canada, the idea of raising the pension age was not overly popular, but it did not create the same level of controversy and debate as the current Russian government proposal. President Putin himself is confronted with his own 2005 statement that he would not countenance a change in pension age. The statement was made at a time when the Russian government was going through the also unpopular process of monetizing some of the social benefits that were a legacy of Soviet practices.

Government pensions are one of the most difficult issues left over from Soviet times and one around which there has probably been the greatest popular resentment. Soviet-era pensions were relatively generous. Nowadays, more important than the occasional delays in payment, the main problem is that the value of the pension itself, for a person retiring at this time, no longer corresponds to the income that could allow a person to live comfortably. Yet, it is still a considerable burden for the state as there is no dedicated pension fund from which to draw. Touching an acquis social such as early age for retirement is not only controversial for the fact that it affects a fundamental right of the worker. In a country where life expectancy overall has grown but still is at 71.6, the argument is being made that a large proportion of men whose life expectancy is lower than that of women would never receive a pension. The counter argument is that life expectancy is on the rise and that the expectation is that Russia is well on its way to catch up. That is the justification for raising the pension age to the accepted international level in order to protect the long-term viability of the system.

The government is trying to sell its proposal by offering assurances that pension amounts will continue to grow significantly in coming years. It also is taking measures to protect the pension system by modernizing it and by making it more similar to pension systems in the rest of the industrial world. This being said, the issue will be remaining at the top of the political agenda for the foreseeable future.


--o--


GAS GUZZLERS




Along with Saudi Arabia and the US, Russia is, year in year out, one of the three largest oil producers. The government recently announced two measures that are related to oil production and consumption. The first part of the plan is a so-called fiscal maneuver that will change the structure of taxation for the oil industry. The rather complex exercise is intended to bring substantially more revenue to the government, facilitate modernisation of the industry as well as promote exports. It also incidentally is intended to help companies that have been subjected to Western sanctions. The whole matter is, however, still the subject of negotiations between the government and oil sector companies.

The second part of the plan is to reduce excise taxes on fuel, creating a budget shortfall of approximately USD$2.2 billion, in order to ensure the stability of gasoline prices on the retail market, a matter of some serious concern since the beginning of 2018. The intent of this second measure is to appease consumers. It may however be seen as encouraging the consumption of more fossil fuels.

--o--

OUT OF UKRAINE ISSUES


The stalemate in the conflict between Kyiv and its Eastern rebel regions means not only that the issue ends to drop from world attention. It also means that the discussion in Ukraine and in Russia tends to shift to issues that are not necessarily central to the conflict, but have large symbolic value. The completion of the bridge linking Crimea to the Russian mainland comes to mind. One could understand that this engineering achievement would receive considerable attention in Russia and would be greeted there with suitable satisfaction. In Ukraine, the news was received with more resignation than anger and soon became the subject of mockery directed at the public figures who had stated that the construction of such a bridge was impossible.

The Crimean Bridge
© Preisent of Russia Website


On an issue that has little to do with the Ukraine-Russia conflict, there were in Ukraine many doubters about the capacity for Russia to host successful Football World Cup events. The idea that Russia might fail at this would have comforted those who tend to view that anything that is good for Russia must be bad for Ukraine, and that the reverse is also true. There were even rumours that Ukraine may take advantage of the Russian leadership being focussed on entertaining a large number of foreign guests to launch a new government-led military offensive in Eastern Ukraine. Although there was increased activity on the front line, no new significant military action was undertaken. There was in fact renewed diplomatic activity. We now even have yet another ceasefire agreement set to begin on July 1st.

We had noted before that there were rumours of frequent phone calls between Presidents Poroshenko and Putin. Through their web sites, the two presidents acknowledged that they indeed spoke by phone on June 21st. The focus of the conversation seems to have been on the issue of political prisoners detained by both sides. The lack of success of the discussion was confirmed by Poroshenko immediately thereafter, as he ordered sanctions against most Russian political parties.
With the announcement of a Putin-Trump summit in July, and Trump saying that Ukraine will be on the agenda, Ukrainian authorities may experience some trepidation. Having seen what happened in the US-North Korea discussions and having heard the rumour that Trump told his G7 counterparts in Charlevoix that “Crimea is Russian because everyone who lives there speaks Russian”, there may indeed be some cause for concern on their part.

Of note for Canadians, the Putin-Trump summit removes another leader from the short list of heads of government who are not in direct contact with Vladimir Putin: Theresa May and Justin Trudeau are the ones left. Despite the recent silence about the Skrypal affair, the matter still justifies May’s reluctance. As for the Poroshenko-Putin phone call, it would seem to undermine the Ukrainian rationale for asking Canada not to engage with Russia.

--o--

THE WORLD CUP IN RUSSIA, SPORT BUT NOT ONLY

So far the Russians have excelled in organizing this World Cup. The logistics were not trivial: 11 cities, some 3,000 kilometers apart, covering 3 time zones, and hundreds of thousands of tourists from all corners of the world. Security, safety and services, according to participants and journalists, have been top notch as well. Previously feared Russian soccer hooligans are also kept in check. Many British soccer fans, on the advice of their Foreign Service, decided to not to go, but those who went have experienced a warm welcome at the sites where England played. Many Russians even cheered for the English team. 




This World Cup also has helped Russia conduct some very important diplomatic activities. Putin was seen at his VIP box with the likes of Crown Prince Salman of Saudi Arabia, President of Azerbaijan Aliev and newly elected PM of Armenia Pashinyan. In fact Putin managed to bring Aliev and Pashinyan together for a handshake during a game in an attempt re-start the negotiation about the endless conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh. Putin also extended an  invitation to Netanyahu and Mahmoud Abbas. Netanyahu has yet to accept, but Abbas already confirmed his attendance. There is little doubt that a lot of less visible yet significant meetings are taking place on the sidelines of this tournament.

--o--


PERSON OF THE MONTH: MOHAMMAD BIN SALMAN BIN ABDULAZIZ AL SAUD


©Wikipedia
The 32-year old Crown Prince Salman of Saudi Arabia has introduced several revolutionary reforms in his conservative kingdom: legalizing rights of women to drive, female concert performances, hiring women in civil service, including the police force. He also significantly restricted the powers of the religious police, also known as vice squads. On the international scene he directly confronted Iran for its involvement in Yemen's civil war and together with Israel strongly lobbied president Trump to withdraw from the Iranian nuclear deal, going as far as to say that if Iran will be allowed to move towards nuclear weapons, Saudis will do the same. In fact Prince Salman almost makes no secret of his strategic alliance with Israel in its confrontation with Iran. He twice hosted in Riyadh Yossi Cohen, the head of the Mossad (Israeli Intelligence Agency) and other Israeli security officials. Recently it has been rumored that Bin Salman secretly met with Israeli PM Netanyahu. In a surprise visit to the World Cup in Moscow for the opening game between Russia and Saudi Arabia, he stoically and with humor endured the Russian thrashing of his team (final score was 5-0 for Russia), while discussing oil business, Iran and Syria with Vladimir Putin. 

--o--

BRIEFLY NOTED


ARMENIA


Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan unleashed an unprecedented anti-corruption campaign. His security forces have arrested Manvel Grigoryan, the previously untouchable Defense Minister and several other key bureaucrats and relatives of former Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan.

This is only the beginning as indictments are being prepared against the mayor of Yerevan (who happens to be the son of the arrested defense minister) and scores of others.

TURKMENISTAN


Turkmenistan introduced tough new austerity measures: food rationing, currency exchange control and limiting electricity use by private citizens. The reason for such draconian measures is the ongoing financial crisis affecting such mega projects as new pipelines and construction of southbound roads.

BELARUS


President Lukashenko met with EU representatives to announce that his country was ready for political reforms that could bring Minsk closer to the standards of European Union. He also stated that Belarus would not object to Ukraine joining NATO in the future, an unusual view for a close Russian ally

GEORGIA


A Georgian court sentenced in absentia former President Mikheil Saakashvili to 6 year imprisonment for abuse of power. It is believed that the real objective of Georgian authorities was to prevent the eccentric, yet popular politician from returning to his native country. He is currently residing in the Netherlands, but is still actively involved in political controversy in both Georgia and Ukraine.

UZBEKISTAN


Uzbekistan has emphasized its readiness to host direct peace talks between the government of neighboring Afghanistan and the Taliban, after both sides announced a cease-fire for the Eid al-Fitr holiday. Although the Taliban withdrew from the ceasefire itself, the negotiations in Tashkent are ongoing. The Foreign Ministry of Uzbekistan confirms its full readiness to create, at any stage of the peace process, all the necessary conditions for setting up direct talks between the government of Afghanistan and the Taliban. The former Soviet republic is seeking to raise its international profile as part of President Shavkat Mirziyoyev’s campaign to open up the nation of 32 million after decades of isolation.

NORTH MACEDONIA 

The Macedonian and Greek parliaments ratified a long-awaited agreement to re-name the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as North Macedonia. Since the collapse of Yugoslavia, Greece refused to recognize independent Macedonia because it claimed for one of its regions the historic name of Macedonia. After years of tortuous negotiations both sides reached a compromise that culminated in the country of Macedonia renaming itself to North Macedonia. However, the President of Macedonia has refused, so far, to ratify the name change.


THE AUTHORS

Ilya Gerol, former foreign editor of the Citizen in Ottawa, syndicated columnist in Canadian, US and European media specializing in international affairs. His particular area of expertise includes Russia, Eurasian Economic Union, Eastern and Central Europe.  Ilya Gerol has written several books, one of them, The Manipulators, had become a textbook on relations of media and society.

During his career in the Canadian Foreign Service, Gilles Breton had three assignments at the Canadian Embassy in Moscow. His first posting there began during the Soviet period, in 1983. His last was from 2008 to 2012 as Minister-Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission. He also served as Deputy Director responsible for Canada’s relations with Russia from 2000 to 2008. As an international civil servant, he was Deputy Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights in Warsaw from 1994 to 1997.




Thursday, May 31, 2018

Issue 19

THE BRETON/GEROLNEWSLETTER


THE WINDOW ON THE WEST, BUT NOT ONLY


President Putin, Plenary Session of SPIEF, May 25th
© President of Russia Website

St. Petersburg is the city that Peter the Great built to give Russia a window to Europe. Nowaday the leaders of the city are adding a slightly different political touch to reflect their current mood: St. Petersburg was built to counter the European powers that wanted to restrain Russia and keep it a lesser kingdom without ready maritime access to the rest of Europe. President Putin himself did not go as far in his remarks and there was more self-confidence than defiance in his approach to this year’s late May St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF). The moderators of the main plenary session noted that it looked as though Donald Trump had managed to get people together that would not normally meet on one open stage: Putin was hosting French President Macron, Japanese Prime Minister Abe, Chinese Vice President Wang Qishan as well as the Director General of the International Monetary Fund Christine Lagarde. Putin may have found the remark about Trump amusing, but would probably take the credit himself for bringing together in his home town  all that want to do business with Russia, thus comforting his own position in the world even in the company of some that have taken sanctions against Russia.

For a North American visitor the most striking thing at the SPIEF was probably the impression of onset of acute schizophrenia. The conversation in St. Petersburg was truly a world away from the issues that daily give Russia a bad press in Western Europe and North America. It was about how to engage Russia politically and economically. The attempt to belittle the significance of the consensus by suggesting it did not come together as a formal alliance misses the point: despite the serious disagreements over specific issues world leaders minus two maybe three are comfortable engaging in a political dialogue with Russia. Business leaders from virtually everywhere are keen to do business with Russia, including even those from the US, the UK or Canada whose leaders are not politically engaged with Russia at this time. The convergence of interests is perfectly sufficient in itself and does not need a formal instrument.

There was of course some discussion about sanctions against Russia. The only practical recommendation was that business interests in the US should lobby their government to review its position, in view of the fact that sanctions are disruptive, but do not achieve any of their announced goals. As for sanctions that target individual oligarchs allegedly belonging to Putin’s inner circle, the response is clear: Russia will protect its enterprises, oligarchs are on their own. From all appearances oligarchs will manage to survive one way or another, as Roman Abramovich’s timely acquisition of Israeli citizenship to counter British measures against him just shows.

SPIEF serves as a platform for discussing economic issues, delivering economic messages and for promoting economic cooperation in the form of investment and trade. In addition to the above-mentioned confidence displayed by President Putin, the other overall message was one of optimism, coming from the record number of attendants at this year Forum, over 17,000.

Not unexpectedly, this was also the time for Russia to receive very good marks from international observers, including from the IMF, for its macroeconomic management in the current difficult environment: Russia’s budgetary stance has been rigorous, its financial position is sound with good reserves and low liabilities. Furthermore, the economic consensus on which the president has based the orientation that he has given to the new government is that the focus for the next few years should be on investing in infrastructure. A few months ago the concern was that the funding for infrastructures investment might be difficult to generate. The conjuncture has changed: the recent rise in the price of oil is creating an unexpected surplus that the government is already setting aside precisely for infrastructure needs.

All in all, for Russia and for Putin himself, the event was a success. For a native of Russia’s Northern Capital, things could hardly have been better: the city of St. Petersburg came first on the annual Russian Regional Investment Climate Index competition.

JOURNALISM AND JOURNALISTS, AS VICTIMS OF WAR: UKRAINE UPDATE


President Poroshenko, Arkady Babchenko, Security Service Head Hrytsak, Prosecutor General Lutsenko
Kyiv, May 30th
©President of Ukraine Website

The May 29th staged contract killing of Russian journalist Arkady Babchenko will most likely not win Kyiv any new friends. It may even lose some old friends for having resorted to an extreme tactic to procure the arrest of the single individual that is alleged to have received an advance payment for the killing of Babchenko. The day after Kyiv even drew sharp criticism from the OSCE and Reporters Without Borders for manipulation of information.

As expected, Kyiv will continue to blame Moscow for the whole incident, but by playing a game Kyiv has damaged its own credibility. Babchenko apparently did not tell his wife about the sting operation. One can speculate that she may not be the only one to have been kept in the dark about the plans for smoking out a Russian agent. As for Moscow, it initially called the whole affair idiotic, but reacted relatively calmly in the circumstances. Ultimately, it is difficult to believe that the operation was the only way to save Babchenko’s life and to arrest the potential killer.

Truth is often noted as the first casualty of war. Journalists are not far behind. Ukraine and Russia continue to arrest, detain and prosecute journalists and various artists from opposing sides. Kirill Vyshinsky, the chief RIA (Russian press agency) representative in Kyiv was arrested and charged with espionage while Ukrainian film producer Alexei Sentsov was sentenced by a Russian court to 20 years in prison on terrorism charges. Human rights organizations accuse Russian and Ukraine of what they call "hostage taking" in order to facilitate potential prisoner exchanges.

News stories can indeed have a major impact. The news that President Poroshenko seems to have arranged for the payment of somewhere around $400,000 to secure a longer meeting with President Trump during his June 2017 visit to Washington did more damage to Poroshenko’s reputation than any of the accusations leveled by his erstwhile ally Mikheil Saakashvili. The latter, in his usual egocentric manner, is now calling for Europe to take sanctions against Poroshenko for having violated his human rights. In any event, short of a war or some cataclysmic political development, Poroshenko is now firmly on track to join the group of former presidents of Ukraine. Rumours abound that he may be focusing on comforting his financial position as an oligarch, that of which Saakashvili has been accusing him for a while.

In the meantime, the war in Eastern Ukraine is acquiring all the features of a frozen conflict. In the absence of any solution in Ukraine itself, many Ukrainians seem to see some hope in the activity of Kurt Volker, the US Special Representative for Ukraine. This does not take into account that Volker as a hardliner on Ukraine seems to be in his current position mostly to show that President Trump is not under Russian influence. Real concern for Ukraine itself does not seem to be on Trump’s mind. A solution to the conflict is unlikely to come from Washington.

There are also rumours that, in a country where oligarchs have been calling the shots, some oligarchs may be considering re-aligning their interest with those of Moscow. One should not forget that Babchenko’s enemies may not only be in Moscow.


KOREAN ROLLER-COASTER


Presidents Kim Jung-un and Moon Jae-in
April 26th, Panmunjom


President Trump changed his views and expectations for his historic meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un several times. In the beginning it was a traditional assortment of adjectives "brilliant", "excellent" and "tremendous". Suddenly it has changed to different definitions: "threatening", "insulting" and "rude". This was followed by a threat to use the immense American nuclear arsenal if things do not work diplomatically. Finally, all the accessories of a traditional business deal have been used in full, and the June 12 summit in Singapore is back on the agenda with teams from both countries hurriedly working on its planning. South Korean president Moon should be credited with putting June 12th meeting back on track by staying in touch with both sides while explaining to Trump, who evidently lacks in-depth understanding of North Korea and its psychology, the intricacies of Korean negotiating tactics.

According to South Korean sources, Kim Jung Un will agree to the main demand by the American president to fully denuclearize his country, under the formula of denuclearization of the whole Peninsula.

Most experts agree that the most challenging aspect of any future deal will the realistic verification of North Korean compliance.

Nobody needs this deal more than Kim. He promised his people to improve their desperate living conditions, improve the overall economy and the food supply. In order to introduce something similar to the Chinese-style reforms he has to deliver a diplomatic victory, as only the US, South Korea and Japan can be of real assistance.


THE KAZAKHSTAN MODEL


President Nazerbayev, May 17, Astana
Facebook


Kazakhstan does not often make headlines in international news, but its positive role and influence deserve mention.

Kazakhstan is a country with a Muslim majority population, but with a secular form of governance. Since it became independent in 1991, it has had only one president. Nursultan Nazerbayev has, however, managed to address the multiple challenges of a post-Soviet state in a manner that has earned him a relatively enviable reputation.  An illustration of his style of management and openness to the outside world is the convening every year of the Astana Economic Forum (now called the Global Challenges Conference).

Kazakhstan has also endeavoured to play a positive role in international affairs. Astana continues to host representatives of Syrian political and economic sectors plus delegations from Russia, Iran and Turkey in the search of a peaceful solution to the ongoing Syrian civil war, now in its 7th year. The US is not taking part in this 9th round of negotiations. Parallel UN-sponsored talks are going on in Geneva as well.

Kazakhstan has announced its new regional doctrine aimed at improving relations with all Central Asian countries in order to counter the powerful economic influence of China in the region. In this respect, the recent liberalisation efforts of the new President of neighbouring Uzbekistan are especially good news for Kazakhstan. Considering that Kazakhstan shares one of the longest borders in the world with China, Astana fears that the powerful economic sway of China could eventually lead to unpredictable political changes not exactly favorable to the political aspirations of Kazakhstan and of Russia, its other major neighbour and its associate in the Eurasian Economic Union. For many historical reasons, a more concerted approach among Central Asian countries has been difficult to generate. With the more open approach emerging in Uzbekistan, positive developments may be around the corner.

IRAN AND EURASIAN UNION



The new reformist government in Armenia confirmed its adherence to the Eurasian Economic Union. As Iran faces the threat of new, harsher economic sanctions and limitations by the United States, it looks at its border with Armenia border as a promising gateway for its products into Eurasian markets. Though not in the headlines of world events a conference is taking place in Yerevan with the participation of the Iranian business community and officials of the Eurasian Economic Union. One of the most significant issues discussed is a joint investment project for the restoration of the railway link from Armenia to Russia via Georgia. The implementation of this project would substantially increase the trade volume between Iran and Eurasian countries. In addition, on May 17 in Astana, on the margins of the Astana Global Challenges Conference, Iran had signed a provisional free trade zone agreement with the Eurasian Economic Union.

US MOVE AGAINST IRAN STRAINS THE TRANSATLANTIC ALLIANCE


President Trump and the Iran Executive Order, May 9


At the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, French President Macron said it better than anybody else. The only reason why Trump got out of the Iran deal is because it was concluded under Barack Obama’s presidency. There is nothing wrong with the deal itself. Secretary of State Pompeo’s recent demands to Iran regarding ballistic missiles, support to Hezbollah or military presence in Syria were not part of the original discussion.

Not since the 2003 controversial US invasion of Iraq the unity of Western allies was subjected to such a strain. This time however the rift is much more pronounced and the consequences maybe more serious than 15 years ago. The European reaction could summarized in the stern words of French foreign minister who said: "We are allies not vassals". Paris, London and Berlin would like you stay within the framework of the Iran treaty if some aspects like the Iranian ballistic missile program and the nuclear breakout timing could be re-negotiated. Moscow and Beijing are against any changes in the agreement.

What makes European position vulnerable, and Americans new that very well in advance, is that major European companies like Total, BP and Airbus go where the money is. That is why they have quickly announced cancellation of their multi-billion dollar projects with Iran not risking the wrath of American sanctions. In this situation European leaders are trying somewhat to stabilize their relations with Russia. Angela Merkel met Putin in Sochi in early May. Macron flew to St. Petersburg for the International Economic Forum where he held prolonged in-depth talks with the Russian President.  

President Trump openly disregards feeble European attempts to save the Iranian deal. In the short term Trump is having his way, but a long term prognosis may spell serious decline of the Western alliance that has dominated international politics for over seven decades.


PERSON OF THE MONTH: ANTON SILUANOV


Anton Siluanov
© Roscongress

The 55 year old soft-spoken professional financier and economist, Anton Siluanov was appointed by President Putin to be First Deputy Prime Minister responsible for economic reforms. He remains Russia's Finance Minister as in the previous Medvedev's government. For all his professional life Siluanov has worked in various branches of the Ministry of Finance or associated entities. He could be defined as a modern, Russian technocrat who has developed and sharpened his skills in the post-Soviet reality. He is at the top of the class of well-educated and well-qualified group of relatively young professionals who have taken over the Ministry of Finance. They uphold the standards set by Alexei Kudrin when he led the Ministry from 2000 to 2011. At the recent St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Christine Lagarde, Director General of the IMF, heaped praise on Siluanov as an exemplary Minister of Finance.

The next six years of this government in Russia will demonstrate if this statement was correct.

BRIEFLY NOTED


OPEC-RUSSIA

On May 25th, in St. Petersburg, Russian minister of energy Aleksandr Novak met his Saudi counterpart Khaled-Al Fateh. They discussed the best way of implementing the OPEC initiative to gradually raise oil production in order to ease consumer worries over higher oil prices world-wide. Ongoing tensions between US and Iran endanger the Iranian oil supplies to markets while pushing prices up. Currently a barrel of crude trades on the London exchange close to $ 80.

BULGARIA

Rumen Radev, President of Bulgaria asked Vladimir Putin to come back to the idea of a pipeline supplying this Balkan country with Russian natural gas. The very same Bulgarian administration turned down this idea two years ago out of solidarity with its NATO allies. This time the economic realities prevailed.

BELARUS

#MeToo comes to Belarus. Olga Korbut, a household name in Europe and beyond as a world famous Soviet-era gymnast, presently residing in Belarus, has accused her former coach of sexual assault dating to the time when she was 14 years old. Some of her teammates support her allegations and have accusations of their own. The coach denies the wrongdoing.

AZERBAIJAN


The gas pipeline between Azerbaijan and Turkey became operational and construction of an additional link to Southern Europe should be completed in two years. Potentially this pipeline from Shah-Denis natural gas deposits represents serious competition for Russia’s Gazprom.

GEORGIA


The Republic of Georgia cut off diplomatic relations with Syria right after Damascus had extended its recognition to the two breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia that split from Georgia in the aftermath of brief 2008 Russia-Georgian war. From now on Syria and Russia are establishing direct trade lines from Syria to ports in Abkhazia as well as Crimea.

MOLDOVA


Moldova obtained a status of "observer" within the Eurasian Economic Union. This paves the way for Moldova to gain better access to Eurasian markets including especially Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus.


THE AUTHORS

Ilya Gerol, former foreign editor of the Citizen in Ottawa, syndicated columnist in Canadian, US and European media specializing in international affairs. His particular area of expertise includes Russia, Eurasian Economic Union, Eastern and Central Europe.  Ilya Gerol has written several books, one of them, The Manipulators, had become a textbook on relations of media and society.

During his career in the Canadian Foreign Service, Gilles Breton had three assignments at the Canadian Embassy in Moscow. His first posting there began during the Soviet period, in 1983. His last was from 2008 to 2012 as Minister-Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission. He also served as Deputy Director responsible for Canada’s relations with Russia from 2000 to 2008. As an international civil servant, he was Deputy Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights in Warsaw from 1994 to 1997.


Monday, April 30, 2018

Issue 18

THE BRETON/GEROL NEWSLETTER


SHOOT FIRST, ASK QUESTIONS LATER


The use of chemical weapons is absolutely condemnable. In Europe and North America, Bashar al Assad generally has a terrible reputation, on several accounts. The President of France has previously stated that the use of chemical weapons is a red line not to be crossed. On April 7th allegations emerge that chemical weapons have been used by the Assad forces in Eastern Ghouta. An amateur video seems to confirm this. What more is needed to launch retaliatory strikes against Assad’s alleged chemical weapons research facilities and installations? If at the same time the opportunity exists to show common resolve between the US, France and the UK, what can go wrong?

A few things can go wrong. More and more reputable observers, including Western military specialists, have begun to cast doubt on the reality of the April 7th incident, underlining the fact that it made no sense from either a military or political point of view, since the Eastern Ghouta battle was virtually over. Other observers have begun to cast doubt on the effectiveness of the military response, the April 14th targeted missile strike. The Syrians have even boasted to have sent to Moscow an unexploded Tomahawk missile, so that it could be thoroughly analysed by Russian specialists. Poor Secretary of Defense Mattis, who probably played a crucial role in making this a sensible strike, was left trying to answer the question as to how you can destroy a chemical weapons storage facility without causing the accidental release of deadly chemicals. “We do our best! “is the only answer he could give. Public opinion polls also showed that there was not a very strong popular support for the strikes.

What started as “Trump, Macron and May more decisive than Obama story” moves to the back pages of the newspapers, if such things still exist. Yet, in the meantime, not having awaited the outcome of expectedly futile UN Security Council discussions, the OPCW decides to send its own inspectors to the Eastern Ghouta. After having met the exigencies of the UN Security Division the inspectors finally gain access to the area where chemical weapons were allegedly used. The OPCW is however no different than any other fact-finding entity. It can find evidence of the use of chemical weapons and make a definite statement about that. If it does not find such evidence, it can only say that it has not found evidence, but cannot make a definite statement to the effect that chemical weapons were not used. The public relations battle will not stop with the tabling of the OPCW report, for sure.

Throughout this process, Macron claims to have convinced Trump to keep US forces in Syria. Finishing off ISIS and working for long-term peace in Syria would be the objectives. Yet, Trump’s instincts would have him leave Syria. It is easy to understand why there would be limited interest in continuing being involved in the Northern Syria standoff between the Kurdish forces and the Turkish army and its local allies. In Southern Syria, it might make more sense to keep a military presence near the Iraq border. That might serve as a tool that could limit the ambitions of Iran and Hezbollah. How effective that presence would be is a big question. Ultimately though, for Macron, the issue is not the US military presence per se but the continuing involvement of the US in the overall discussions on Syria, more specifically in the recently inactive UN-led Geneva peace process. Macron clearly has a preference for that process over the Russia/Iran /Turkey-led Astana peace process. There are serious issues at stake: who participates and whether a durable peace arrangement can be achieved.

Since the US-UK-France strikes, the Syrian forces have continued their offensive against the remaining pockets of rebel resistance, especially in the southeast of the country, in areas that are relatively close to Damascus. Whereas there may little progress in the peace and reconstruction process, the Assad regime is progressively regaining control of its territory, strengthening its position whenever it has to sit down at a negotiating table, if ever.

Even though Turkey joined Western countries in condemning the alleged use of chemical weapons in Eastern Ghouta, this did not prevent the Foreign Ministers of Turkey, Iran and Russia having a meeting in Moscow on April 28th. On the occasion, they agreed on holding another high-level meeting of the Macron-disliked “Astana format peace negotiations “in Astana in mid-May.
Ultimately, in themselves, the alleged chemical incident, the military response and the ensuing public relations battle that follows do not so much matter for the future. What will matter more is whether France having used the incident to keep the US in Syria will be able to take advantage of that to give new life to its preferred peace process. Given the evolution of the situation in Syria, there may not be a lot of time left to do that.


--o--

ARMENIA ON EDGE


Serzh Sargsyan only recently completed the major reform of transforming Armenia from a presidential republic into a parliamentary one. Despite having given prior assurances to the contrary, he then moved from the position of President to that of Prime Minister, de facto remaining in power. He now has admitted his error and resigned in order to quell massive street protests.

Sargsyan led Armenia for 10 years with two main principles in mind: close relations with Russia and steadfast defense of the status quo in the bitter conflict with Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh. Sargsyan is himself a native of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Sargsyan’s “clinging” to power triggered popular discontent that quickly morphed into demands for radical improvements in living standards as well as more political freedom. With the lack of real progress on the economic front for the whole period of Sargsyan’s presidential tenure as well as the widespread perception of pervasive corruption, the prospect of his use of constitutional reform to remain in power indefinitely brought the situation to a breaking point. The Government in Yerevan could not use violent force against protesters for many reasons, one being that on April 24th Armenia marks the anniversary of the 1915-1923 genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman government. On that occasion, thousands of Armenians from France, Russia, Germany and the United States arrive in the country. The presence of uniformed soldiers among the protesters may also have been cause for restraint.

With the resignation of Sargsyan, a new Prime Minister has to be chosen by Parliament. This is to be done on May1st. If no candidate receives a majority of votes, there will be a second attempt 7 days later. If that attempt also fails, Parliament is dissolved and new elections are held. Since the last parliamentary elections were held in April 2017, there is some normal pressure for this “young” legislature to sort out the matter. This is also what President Putin suggested in his call on Acting Prime Minister Karapetian on April, along with the insistence that the crisis be resolved exclusively through legal means. Later on, the State Department issued a roughly similar statement. If new elections have to be held, the coalition of reformers led by parliamentarian Nikol Pashinyan, the leader of the recent protests could well win, but Pashinyan himself has insisted that he should be appointed Prime Minister since he is the people’s choice. This is becoming more likely. Armen Sarkissian, the President of Armenia, is reported as trying to facilitate dialogue between the parties.

Whoever becomes Prime Minister, be it sooner or later, there is no expectation of a major change in Armenia’s geo-political positioning. If compared to its ancient predecessors, modern Armenia is a small country. It is in conflict with two neighbours, Turkey and Azerbaijan, and gets along with the third one, Georgia, more by necessity than by affinity. Russia is the only strong economic and military ally and support base. Russia is generally wary of situations where street protests run the risk of creating unpredictability and eventually political chaos. Its reaction this time has been guarded. Russia has no reason to be overly concerned by even very significant re-alignments on the internal political scene. This is not likely to become another battlefield between the US and Russia.

Even if Russia may not be overly pleased with the current crisis, the departure from power of Sargsyan may not be considered as a terrible loss. Despite the perception of Sargsyan’s strong pro-Russian inclinations, there were issues. Ultimately, one might even contend that outgoing Prime Minister Sargsyan’s profile is similar to that of several regional leaders that have been sacked by Vladimir Putin. Furthermore, should events in Armenia lead to a turn towards more openness and liberalization, Russia may rather welcome a more dynamic yet still friendly partner, something that certainly corresponds to the traditional image of Armenia as a place of initiative and creation, even during the Soviet period.


--o--

UNTYING THE KOREAN KNOT


Kim Jong-un and Moon Jae-in, Panmunjom, April 27th

In his last act as CIA director Mike Pompeo made a secret visit to North Korea during the recent Easter holiday and met with Kim Jong-un. The purpose of the trip was to set up the expected meeting between President Trump and Kim. This odd summit will take place in June. For its location, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia’s capital is currently the first choice, with Singapore in second place. (It looks as though Trump may want a more spectacular location.) Kim's unexpected decision to discuss denuclearization has been prompted by a combination of factors such as the heavy pressure from China, the main ally and support base of the North Korean regime, the discrete diplomacy of Russia that sent several delegations to meet its former client and, of course, the never seen before credible threat of US military action. This last point will be conveniently re-reinforced during the negotiations with North Korea by the recent strike on Syrian targets by an American-led coalition: the threat had been made, it was carried out quickly, without the need for a formal UN approval.

Washington also gave its blessing to the inter-Korean summit which just took place in the demilitarized zone between North and South. Technically both countries are still in a state of war. The armistice signed in 1953 at the conclusion of a 3 year-long conflict is the only formal agreement between the two states. This time the Korean leaders agreed on the principle of denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and on the proposal to pursue talks with the US and China toward the negotiation of a real peace treaty that would bestow normalization of economic, political and cultural relations. The idea of such a negotiation has already been endorsed by President Trump.

There are reasons to believe that Kim may do away with his nuclear program in exchange for the end of sanctions, massive economic and financial assistance from the US, South Korea and Japan and firm guarantees for his regime's security. The idea of allocating fewer resources to the military may eventually come up, but not immediately as it raises some fundamental questions about the very nature of the North Korean regime.

As for possible obstacles in the peace process, observers have mostly raised the question of the genuine nature of North Korea’s commitment to peace. Only time will tell, but current indications are indeed positive. A problem may, however, still arise on the other side. For now, there are seemingly no difference between the US and South Korean positions. In light of his recent highly-visible success, Moon Jae-in could become too enthusiastic and less uncompromising. In that context, keeping some of the limelight for Donald Trump might not be a bad idea.


--o--

TRADE WITH RUSSIA GROWS DESPITE SANCTIONS



It is a common view that the worsening of international relations and the wide spread use of economic sanctions rapidly downgrades bilateral trade. In the case of trade relations between Canada and Russia the reverse dynamics appear to take place. According to Eurasian Union statistics, Russian exports to Canada have been steadily increasing and reached over $1 billion in 2017, roughly 50% more than in the previous year. Russia sells to Canada mineral products, chemicals, machinery, plastic and base metals. Meanwhile Canadian exports to Russia also have increased by over 35%, with machinery and transport equipment in the lead. It is worth recalling that Canada lost pork exports to Russia as the main element of Canadian export structure. In 2012-2013 Russia purchased almost $500 million worth of pork. These sales were lost due to counter sanctions introduced by Moscow in response to Canadian measures put in effect immediately after the beginning of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.

The International Economic Forum in St. Petersburg (May 25-26) will address this new reality: how to manage the growth of international trade in a sanction-ridden world. More on that will follow in next month’s issue.


--o--

UKRAINE UPDATE


Patriarch Bartholomew, President Poroshenko, Istanbul, April 9th

There have been serious efforts to move along the proposal for a peacekeeping contingent in Eastern Ukraine. There are indications that the proposal may be closer to reality than ever before. It could well be that, after the appointment of the new government in Russia in mid-May, the matter will receive increased attention. This being said, the overall prospects for peaceful settlement of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine are as remote as ever. As noted before, in the current circumstances in Ukraine, there is no appetite for any form of compromise with rebel regions. There is also no outside pressure on Kyiv authorities since they enjoy the unconditional support of their Western allies. There are as well occasional rumours that the presidential and parliamentary elections that are scheduled for 2019 could be held at an earlier date. In the context of this pre-electoral atmosphere, there is no likelihood whatsoever of any change in the position of Kyiv on how to reintegrate the Donbass into Ukraine.

An example of the unconditional support extended to Kyiv was given at the recent meeting of G7 Foreign Affairs ministers in Toronto. On the occasion, the chair of the meeting, Canadian Foreign Minister Freeland invited the Foreign Minister of Ukraine to address the meeting. The objective was clearly to firm up G7 support for Ukraine and to keep “the disruptive influence of Russia on the West” as a top agenda item.

As for President Poroshenko, it seems as though seasoned political observers in Ukraine are already writing his political obituary, as his chances for re-election seem to get slimmer every month. Poroshenko himself does not however seem to want to give up and has turned to a highly symbolic, sensitive and complex issue to restore some of his credentials.

During his April 9th visit in Istanbul, Poroshenko met Oecumenical Orthodox Patriarch Bartholomew in Istanbul to discuss the possibility of granting the tomos of autocephaly i.e. independence to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine, with a view to creating one independent Ukrainian Orthodox Church. There are currently three Orthodox churches in Ukraine, each one with its own patriarch. Only one of them formally recognizes the authority of the Moscow Patriarchate. Following consultations with the three patriarchs and with parliamentarians, Poroshenko sent one of his officials to Istanbul to deliver his appeal for the tomos of autocephaly to the Oecumenical Patriarch. This will likely be followed by elaborate consultations, including discussions between the Oecumenical Patriarch and the Moscow Patriarch. Should the Oecumenical Patriarch agree to granting independence to a united Ukrainian Orthodox Church, deciding which of the three patriarchs should head that entity is going to be a most difficult process. Even if the patriarchs were to agree among themselves, there is no guarantee that their followers would. The Moscow Patriarchate would most likely never accept a decision that would affect its jurisdiction. There could follow a serious and lengthy inter-confessional crisis in Ukraine, where the animosity between Ukrainian and pro-Moscow Orthodox Churches is deeply set.


--o--

PERSON OF THE MONTH: EMMANUEL MACRON

Presidents Macron and Trump, Washington, April 23rd

The youthful president of France is steadily taking over the leadership of contemporary Europe. Germany's Angela Merkel has been retreating from this role due to the weakness of her coalition and her somewhat strained relations with Donald Trump. The recent joint attack on Syria by US, UK and France has propelled Macron into a strategic parity with his more global allies.

Macron’s recent visit to the US reinforced his growing influence with Trump. Macron managed to steer Trump away from withdrawing American troops from Syria and making coalition strikes less devastating and away from Russia's zones of control in order not to risk all out conflict with powerful Russia. His best efforts to persuade Trump not to leave the nuclear deal with Iran were not successful, but he not giving up. He is now taking the approach that it might be possible to negotiate an even better deal for the future, while keeping the current arrangement on the understanding that the "imperfect deal is better than no deal at all".

He also wants to play a peacemaker role with Russia and wants to work with the Kremlin to fix Middle East and Ukrainian issues. In late May, Macron will go to the St. Petersburg Economic Forum to promote growing French trade and investment interests in Russia as well as for a meeting with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.


--o--

BRIEFLY NOTED


AZERBAIJAN


In April 2018, after the targeted strike on Syria, Azerbaijan hosted high level talks between Russian Chief of Staff General Gerasimov and NATO military Commander General Scaparrotti, the first such talks since 2013.The parties discussed issues of military activities of NATO and Russia in the European region as well as raising the level of confidence and prevention of incidents. They also exchanged views on Syria and the fight against international terrorism.
Separetely Gerasimov held talks with Azerbaijan President Aliyev and his military advisers on cooperation between Russia and Azerbajan. When Armenia is in a state of political turmoil, Russia's military assistance to Azerbaijan can become a very delicate issue.

BELARUS


Aleksandr Lukashenko who has led  Belarus since 1994 said in his televised address to parliament that his country will try to keep good relations not only with Russia, its traditional ally, but with the EU and United States. He accused Russia of unfairness and economic discrimination against Belarus dairy and other industries. He promised to develop better ties with the EU in the sphere of exports of Belorussian agricultural products. He also confirmed that Belarus could be part of peacekeeping force in Ukraine should the UN so require.

RUSSIA-US


The US Treasury Department announced that the sanctions recently introduced against the Russian aluminum giant Rusal could be lifted providing that Oleg Deripaska, the main shareholder and the CEO, would leave the company. It was explained that the main target of sanctions was Deripaska himself, as a member of Putin's inner circle, not the company as such. This decision could save thousands of jobs in many countries, including the United States. Russian officials indicated that such a compromise maybe in the works.

KAZAKHSTAN


Human rights observers reported about the increasing tensions between Kazakhstan and China in connection with ethnic Kazakhs' in their border provinces. More than 1 million Kazakhs now reside in China. Growing prominence of Kazakhstan on the international arena gave rise to local Kazakh nationalism in China. Some Kazakhs there demand more cultural autonomy and closer ties and travel privileges with their native Kazakhstan. China wants to downplay these nationalistic tendencies. For its part, Astana welcomes the influx of Chinese Kazakhs as a means of offsetting its large Russian speaking population. 

CANADA-RUSSIA


On a slightly lighter and musical note, the Vancouver Courier just recently published an article with the heading “Vancouver Opera Festival colludes with Russia”. This has nothing to do with Donald Trump or fake news, but refers to a major cultural festival being held in Vancouver. We offer you a direct quote from the Vancouver Opera website:
From April 28 to May 6, under the banner of the Russian White Nights, the second annual Vancouver Opera Festival celebrates Russian composers with a Russian classic opera, a much anticipated opera premiere, a series of instrumental and vocal chamber music concerts, and much more.  https://www.vancouveropera.ca/

 

THE AUTHORS


Ilya Gerol, former foreign editor of the Citizen in Ottawa, syndicated columnist in Canadian, US and European media specializing in international affairs. His particular area of expertise includes Russia, Eurasian Economic Union, Eastern and Central Europe.  Ilya Gerol has written several books, one of them, The Manipulators, had become a textbook on relations of media and society.

During his career in the Canadian Foreign Service, Gilles Breton had three assignments at the Canadian Embassy in Moscow. His first posting there began during the Soviet period, in 1983. His last was from 2008 to 2012 as Minister-Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission. He also served as Deputy Director responsible for Canada’s relations with Russia from 2000 to 2008. As an international civil servant, he was Deputy Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights in Warsaw from 1994 to 1997.